Skip to content

Why is zipWith3 implemented as it is? #45

@treeowl

Description

@treeowl

zipWith3 is implemented using next rather than acting streamish the way zipWith does. Is there a reason for this? What goes wrong if zipWith3 is implemented using zipWith or zipsWith?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions