-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathP055.py
More file actions
58 lines (46 loc) · 1.68 KB
/
P055.py
File metadata and controls
58 lines (46 loc) · 1.68 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""
If we take 47, reverse and add, 47 + 74 = 121, which is palindromic.
Not all numbers produce palindromes so quickly. For example,
349 + 943 = 1292,
1292 + 2921 = 4213
4213 + 3124 = 7337
That is, 349 took three iterations to arrive at a palindrome.
Although no one has proved it yet, it is thought that some numbers,
like 196, never produce a palindrome. A number that never forms a
palindrome through the reverse and add process is called a
Lychrel number. Due to the theoretical nature of these numbers,
and for the purpose of this problem, we shall assume that a number
is Lychrel until proven otherwise. In addition you are given that
for every number below ten-thousand, it will either
(i) become a palindrome in less than fifty iterations, or,
(ii) no one, with all the computing power that exists,
has managed so far to map it to a palindrome.
In fact, 10677 is the first number to be shown to require over
fifty iterations before producing a palindrome:
4668731596684224866951378664 (53 iterations, 28-digits).
Surprisingly, there are palindromic numbers that are themselves
Lychrel numbers; the first example is 4994.
How many Lychrel numbers are there below ten-thousand?
NOTE: Wording was modified slightly on 24 April 2007 to
emphasise the theoretical nature of Lychrel numbers.
"""
def isPalindrome(n):
s=str(n)
return s==s[::-1]
def lychrel(n, niter=0):
if (niter>50):
return -1
s=str(n)
sly = n + int(s[::-1])
#print sly, niter
if isPalindrome(sly):
return niter
else:
return lychrel(sly, niter+1)
nlych = 0
for n in range(10001):
l = lychrel(n)
if l == -1:
nlych += 1
print nlych #249