You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Add competitive benchmarks and hardware details to README
- Insert a comparison table showing cLog vs. spdlog benchmark numbers and throughput
- Clearly state that benchmarks were run on an AMD Ryzen 9 9800X3D with 32GB DDR5-6000 CL30 RAM
- Add explanatory context to make performance claims more relatable for users
<sub>Numbers from spdlog are for Ubuntu 64-bit, i7-4770 3.4GHz. For cLog, sync/async and file/console modes were tested with 100,000 logs per variant on a modern Linux system. “Logs/sec” is approximate, calculated as 1,000,000 / μs-per-log (higher is better).</sub>
68
+
69
+
**In context:**
70
+
- spdlog is widely recognized as one of the fastest C++ loggers, especially in minimal-formatting scenarios.
71
+
- cLog’s performance is within a small multiple of spdlog, making it *more than fast enough* for the vast majority of high-performance needs. For many applications, sub-2μs logging throughput is essentially “free.”
72
+
- Your code also provides richer structured logging and a modern, easy-to-use API.
0 commit comments