v0.3.0 — A Claude Code skill that converts GSD + Superpowers into one coherent workflow
One skill that makes two powerful systems work as one. No database, no config, no overhead — just intelligent routing.
GSD (project management) and Superpowers (engineering discipline) are excellent independently, but without coordination they conflict:
- Double-planning:
brainstormingruns inside a GSD phase, creating competing design docs - Wrong plan location: SP writes to
docs/plans/, GSD executors look in.planning/phases/ - Subagent nesting: SP's
subagent-driven-developmentspawns inside GSD'sexecute-phase, burning 400k tokens - Missing review: GSD has no code review step — phases ship without quality checks
- Wrong tool for the job:
systematic-debuggingskipped in GSD projects,/gsd:quickused for multi-phase work
One routing decision based on one question: does .planning/ exist?
START: "I need to do development work"
│
├─ Bug fix? → systematic-debugging FIRST, then route
├─ Code review? → requesting-code-review (send) / receiving-code-review (receive)
├─ Uncertain approach? → /gsd:spike (validate before committing)
├─ Need a PRD? → write-a-prd → prd-to-issues → route to GSD/SP
│
├─ .planning/ exists? (GSD project)
│ ├─ Trivial fix → /gsd:fast
│ ├─ Small task → /gsd:quick
│ ├─ Feature work → discuss → spec → plan → execute
│ ├─ AI/LLM phase → /gsd:ai-integration-phase → plan → execute → eval-review
│ ├─ UI/frontend → /gsd:ui-phase → implement → /gsd:ui-review
│ ├─ Resume work → /gsd:resume-work
│ ├─ Phase complete → verify → code review → /gsd:ship
│ └─ Capture idea → /gsd:note / /gsd:add-backlog / /gsd:plant-seed
│
└─ No .planning/? (standalone)
├─ New project → /gsd:new-project
├─ Existing codebase → /gsd:map-codebase
└─ Feature work → brainstorming → writing-plans → subagent-driven-dev
| Layer | System | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Macro | GSD | Project → milestones → phases → plans → state |
| Micro | Superpowers | TDD, debugging, verification, code review per task |
GSD orchestrates what to build. Superpowers enforce how to build it correctly.
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
/torque:status |
Where am I? Unified view across GSD + SP |
/torque:check |
Verify installation and detect misconfigurations |
/torque:next |
Smart next-action — reads state, suggests one command |
/torque:migrate |
Assess upgrade path to Meridian |
- Full GSD + SP coverage — routes 40+ GSD commands and 15+ Superpowers skills
- AI/LLM integration path —
/gsd:ai-integration-phase→ AI-SPEC.md → eval pipeline - Spec phase in pipeline —
/gsd:spec-phaselocks falsifiable requirements before planning - Spike/sketch exploration — validate feasibility before committing to full planning
- PRD pipeline —
write-a-prd→prd-to-issues→ route to execution - Ship flow —
/gsd:shipand/gsd:pr-branchfor clean PRs (filters.planning/) - Review both ways —
requesting-code-review+receiving-code-review - 12 integration rules (was 7), 15 workflow guides (was 10), 10 conflict scenarios (was 7)
- Extended utilities — backlog, todos, spikes, architecture analysis, changelog, browser testing
See CHANGELOG.md for full details.
git clone https://github.com/mattjaikaran/torque.git ~/.claude/skills/torqueVerify:
ls ~/.claude/skills/torque/SKILL.md && echo "Installed"- GSD (v1.34+ recommended)
- Superpowers
Run /torque:check after install to verify everything is wired up.
torque/
├── SKILL.md # Main routing logic + version
├── CHANGELOG.md # Version history
├── skills/
│ ├── status/SKILL.md # /torque:status
│ ├── check/SKILL.md # /torque:check
│ ├── next/SKILL.md # /torque:next
│ └── migrate/SKILL.md # /torque:migrate
└── references/
├── decision-flowchart.md # Visual decision tree + anti-patterns
├── integration-rules.md # GSD executor + SP discipline protocols
├── workflows.md # 10 step-by-step scenario guides
├── conflict-resolution.md # Troubleshooting guide
└── comparison.md # Torque vs Meridian vs raw
- Plan location: GSD uses
.planning/phases/, SP usesdocs/plans/. Never mix. - Brainstorming:
discuss-phasefor GSD work,brainstormingfor standalone only. - Subagent execution: GSD executors OR SP subagent-driven-dev. Never nested.
- Debugging: SP
systematic-debuggingruns first for all bugs. - Code review (send): Always run after GSD
verify-work— fills GSD's missing review step. - Code review (receive): Use
receiving-code-reviewto verify feedback before implementing. - UI discipline: Run
/gsd:ui-phasebefore frontend implementation,/gsd:ui-reviewafter. - AI discipline: Run
/gsd:ai-integration-phasebefore AI/LLM work,/gsd:eval-reviewafter. - Spec before plan: Run
/gsd:spec-phasebetween discuss and plan for ambiguous scope. - Spike before commit: Run
/gsd:spikewhen feasibility is uncertain. - Ship cleanly: Use
/gsd:shipor/gsd:pr-branchto filter.planning/from PRs. - Learnings persist: GSD captures execution patterns. Query with
/gsd:intel.
| Torque | Meridian | |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Routes between GSD + SP | Standalone engine |
| Setup | git clone and go |
git clone + /meridian:init |
| State | File-based (.planning/) |
SQLite database |
| Dependencies | GSD + Superpowers | None |
| Commands | 4 + routes to GSD/SP | 39 native |
| Resume | File-based | Deterministic (same state = same prompt) |
| Quality gates | Suggested | Enforced |
| Board sync | No | Yes (Linear, Jira) |
| Remote dispatch | No | Yes |
| Best for | Simple-to-medium projects | Complex, long-running projects |
Start here. Upgrade when you need to. Run /torque:migrate to assess.
MIT