Skip to content

Journal prediction should flag relevance #191

@ardunn

Description

@ardunn

There is no relevance warning for nonsense journal predictions:

The analysis on "Not a real abstract" is:

[['Mathematical and Computer Modelling', 0.7567519545555115], ['Biometric Technology Today', 0.7155683636665344], ['Journal of Materials Science Letters', 0.7097627520561218], ['Applied Mathematics and Computation', 0.6746547222137451], ['IFAC-PapersOnLine', 0.6410911083221436], ['Annual Reviews in Control', 0.6306076049804688], ['Oral Oncology Extra', 0.6169986128807068], ['Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence', 0.6154762506484985], ['Computers in Industry', 0.6138418912887573], ['European Journal of Control', 0.6119754910469055]]

No relevance field is found.

Once the backend has this working, should take ~5min on the frontend

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

backendRequires changes on the backendnot directly solved by uniboxIssue is unrelated to or not superceded by unibox

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions