QOL for study review #1834
Description
TL;DR
The study review interface is clunky for its current needs (having outgrown the internal-only process when there were more like 50 labs than 250.) Mark S asked the following!
Narrative
If the lift is small, the bigger improvement would be a UX improvement on the admin review queue to have some additional groups. Right now, three big categories are mixed together:
Brand new study I have never seen before
Study being resubmitted with changes after an admin review
Study being resubmitted with changes after being approved previously
I sometimes remember a study title and its history (but titles sometimes change!). I can also see "internal" vs. "external" which correlates 95% with study type (not 100% because a study could be "internal" for quick video consent but otherwise be off platform). For an internal study that has collected data I can quickly spot that it is category 3 because of the non-zero numbers. All this visible in below screenshot.
Acceptance Criteria
A precise description of how/when this issue will be considered closed, e.g.:
- Tests for new feature
- QA on new feature
- Sign off from Kim
Implementation Notes
Leave important notes/suggestions here for implementation (important files, suggested approaches, etc.)