Skip to content

The caption describes outdated qualification logic that mentions "OR high momentum (≥30%) with >60%/<40% probability". However, based on the refactored code in scan_pullback_markets, the current logic uses fixed thresholds (>75%/<25%) without the high momentum alternative qualification path. Update this caption to reflect the actual filtering logic: markets qualify if they are >75% or <25%, have sufficient momentum, and pass volume/distance filters. #23

@lbsm2017

Description

@lbsm2017

The caption describes outdated qualification logic that mentions "OR high momentum (≥30%) with >60%/<40% probability". However, based on the refactored code in scan_pullback_markets, the current logic uses fixed thresholds (>75%/<25%) without the high momentum alternative qualification path. Update this caption to reflect the actual filtering logic: markets qualify if they are >75% or <25%, have sufficient momentum, and pass volume/distance filters.

        st.caption("💡 Markets qualify if they are >75% or <25%, have sufficient momentum, and pass volume/distance filters")

Originally posted by @Copilot in #22 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions