-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
Description
Naturally, one should not name their module 1_number, since this module becomes its own environment in R, and no such R objects may have a name beginning with number. The same goes for any other names illegal in R.
However, if a local module one_number can be found along a relative filepath ./path/2/one_number.R, then box::use(./path/2/one_number) will fail:
Error in mapply(FUN = f, ..., SIMPLIFY = FALSE) :
Expected identifier in module prefix, got 2
(inside “parse_mod_prefix(expr[[2L]])”)
This is likely a minor issue, but it could throw newcomers for a loop. While everything under the global box.path is presumably a module (nested or otherwise) unto itself, the same cannot be said of local filepaths, and their directories (which need not be modules) should not be bound to naming conventions for R objects. Indeed, one might be forced to rename the entire subdirectory system within one's project.
Is this worth a patch? Perhaps box::use("./path/2/one_number") should be possible, if the unquoted declaration would fail...