Calculating inverses of anything more than 4x4 is quite slow, limit size? #102
Description
Also, the step is crazily long and the answer is a little buggy as it has -0.0. Should we limit it to 4x4?
{{ message }}
Also, the step is crazily long and the answer is a little buggy as it has -0.0. Should we limit it to 4x4?