Skip to content

The results of the paper report #7

@junlinxiang

Description

@junlinxiang

When using the code provided by the author to reproduce the paper, why is the result of reproduction two points lower than that reported in the paper? Is it some trick used in training?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions