You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 13, 2022. It is now read-only.
Hi, for my experiment, built-in (cudnnctc) is about 2.5 times fast than k2-ctc. I was wondering if this is normal and would like to make sure my program is correct.
I found that decoding_graph = k2.compose(self.ctc_topo, label_graph, treat_epsilons_specially=False) is the reason even with build_ctc_topo2#209. How about considering to construct ctc loss directly from text rather than compsing the topo FST and label FST. In my experiment, it would give a very similar speed with cudnnctc.