security-content/stories/dns_hijacking.yml at develop · jwindley-splunk/security-content · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
category:
  - Adversary Tactics
channel: ESCU
creation_date: '2017-11-21'
description: Secure your environment against DNS hijacks with searches that help you
  detect and investigate unauthorized changes to DNS records.
detections:
  - detection_id: 44d3a43e-dcd5-49f7-8356-5209bb369065
    name: DNS record changed
    type: splunk
  - detection_id: 74ec6f18-604b-4202-a567-86b2066be3ce
    name: Clients Connecting to Multiple DNS Servers
    type: splunk
  - detection_id: c77162d3-f93c-45cc-80c8-22f6v5464g9f
    name: Detect hosts connecting to dynamic domain providers
    type: splunk
  - detection_id: 1a67f15a-f4ff-4170-84e9-08cf6f75d6f6
    name: DNS Query Requests Resolved by Unauthorized DNS Servers
    type: splunk
id: 8169f17b-ef68-4b59-aa28-586907301221
maintainers:
  - company: Splunk
    email: bpatel@splunk.com
    name: Bhavin Patel
modification_date: '2018-09-06'
name: DNS Hijacking
narrative: 'Dubbed the Achilles heel of the Internet (see https://www.f5.com/labs/articles/threat-intelligence/dns-is-still-the-achilles-heel-of-the-internet-25613),
  DNS plays a critical role in routing web traffic but is notoriously vulnerable to
  attack. One reason is its distributed nature. It relies on unstructured connections
  between millions of clients and servers over inherently insecure protocols.\

  The gravity and extent of the importance of securing DNS from attacks is undeniable.
  The fallout of compromised DNS can be disastrous. Not only can hackers bring down
  an entire business, they can intercept confidential information, emails, and login
  credentials, as well. \

  On January 22, 2019, the US Department of Homeland Security 2019''s Cybersecurity
  and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) raised awareness of some high-profile
  DNS hijacking attacks against infrastructure, both in the United States and abroad.
  It issued Emergency Directive 19-01 (see https://cyber.dhs.gov/ed/19-01/), which
  summarized the activity and required government agencies to take the following four
  actions, all within 10 days: \

  1. For all .gov or other agency-managed domains, audit public DNS records on all
  authoritative and secondary DNS servers, verify that they resolve to the intended
  location or report them to CISA.\

  1. Update the passwords for all accounts on systems that can make changes to each
  agency 2019''s DNS records.\

  1. Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all accounts on systems that
  can make changes to each agency''s 2019 DNS records or, if impossible, provide CISA
  with the names of systems, the reasons why MFA cannot be enabled within the required
  timeline, and an ETA for when it can be enabled.\

  1. CISA will begin regular delivery of newly added certificates to Certificate Transparency
  (CT) logs for agency domains via the Cyber Hygiene service. Upon receipt, agencies
  must immediately begin monitoring CT log data for certificates issued that they
  did not request. If an agency confirms that a certificate was unauthorized, it must
  report the certificate to the issuing certificate authority and to CISA. Of course,
  it makes sense to put equivalent actions in place within your environment, as well.
  \

  In DNS hijacking, the attacker assumes control over an account or makes use of a
  DNS service exploit to make changes to DNS records. Once they gain access, attackers
  can substitute their own MX records, name-server records, and addresses, redirecting
  emails and traffic through their infrastructure, where they can read, copy, or modify
  information seen. They can also generate valid encryption certificates to help them
  avoid browser-certificate checks. In one notable attack on the Internet service
  provider, GoDaddy, the hackers altered Sender Policy Framework (SPF) records a relatively
  minor change that did not inflict excessive damage but allowed for more effective
  spam campaigns.\

  The searches in this Analytic Story help you detect and investigate activities that
  may indicate that DNS hijacking has taken place within your environment.'
original_authors:
  - company: Splunk
    email: bpatel@splunk.com
    name: Bhavin Patel
references:
  - https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2017/09/apt33-insights-into-iranian-cyber-espionage.html
  - https://umbrella.cisco.com/blog/2013/04/15/on-the-trail-of-malicious-dynamic-dns-domains/
  - http://www.noip.com/blog/2014/07/11/dynamic-dns-can-use-2/
  - https://www.splunk.com/blog/2015/08/04/detecting-dynamic-dns-domains-in-splunk.html
spec_version: 2
usecase: Advanced Threat Detection
version: '1.0'