Suggestions: Ready or Not grammar module

[jwebmeister]

Please post your suggestions for the Ready or Not grammar module here.

Please test your suggestions first!

Try to test if your suggestion causes conflicts with other commands, or otherwise reduces the overall speech recognition accuracy. I suggest at least one mission run, using as many speech commands as possible, particularly those that are similar sounding.

[jwebmeister]

From clsShadow:

map_door_options = {
    "[use the] wand": "mirror",

Note (to self): need to test if it conflicts with other commands, e.g. "wedge"

Added in pull #7

[rake5000]

From clsShadow:

map_door_options = {
    "[use the] wand": "mirror",

Note (to self): need to test if it conflicts with other commands, e.g. "wedge"

to avoid confusion, I've now changed my handle in nexus from clsshadow to rake5000 to be consistend with all my other profiles like here and on discord

I've used both the wegde and wand commands extensively and so far they have never misfired

[rake5000]

Suggestion: add "on my six" as alternative for "fall in". I've tested it on 3 missions, no misfires so far.

class FallIn(CompoundRule):
    """
    Speech recognise team fall in
    """
    spec_1 = "[<color>] [team] [<hold>] (fall in | regroup | form up | on my six) [on me] [<formation>] [on me]"
    spec_2 = "<color> [team] [<hold>] on me [<formation>]"
    spec = f"({spec_1} | {spec_2})"
    extras = [
        Choice("color", map_colors),
        Choice("hold", map_hold),
        Choice("formation", map_ground_fallin_formations),
    ]
    defaults = {
        "color": "current",
        "hold": "go",
        "formation": "single",
    }

    def _process_recognition(self, node, extras):
        color = extras["color"]
        hold = extras["hold"]
        formation = extras["formation"]
        print(f"{color} team {hold} fall in {formation}")
        cmd_fallin(color, hold, formation).execute()

[jwebmeister]

Suggestion: add "on my six" as alternative for "fall in". I've tested it on 3 missions, no misfires so far.

It’s a good suggestion, but I’m going to leave it for users to add themselves, for now.

I’m hoping to use (and thus reserving) numbers and cardinal directions in future commands. This requires additional functionality in-game, so it might not happen, and likely not anytime soon.

[madmaximus101]

Suggestion: add "on my six" as alternative for "fall in". I've tested it on 3 missions, no misfires so far.

class FallIn(CompoundRule):
    """
    Speech recognise team fall in
    """
    spec_1 = "[<color>] [team] [<hold>] (fall in | regroup | form up | on my six) [on me] [<formation>] [on me]"
    spec_2 = "<color> [team] [<hold>] on me [<formation>]"
    spec = f"({spec_1} | {spec_2})"
    extras = [
        Choice("color", map_colors),
        Choice("hold", map_hold),
        Choice("formation", map_ground_fallin_formations),
    ]
    defaults = {
        "color": "current",
        "hold": "go",
        "formation": "single",
    }

    def _process_recognition(self, node, extras):
        color = extras["color"]
        hold = extras["hold"]
        formation = extras["formation"]
        print(f"{color} team {hold} fall in {formation}")
        cmd_fallin(color, hold, formation).execute()

i can also confirm this works flawlessly, have been using the "on my six" command for weeks now. Unsure if important or irrelevant - I am using the large version of the three LLM speech recognition algorithms provided. So far no issues with that either.