Skip to content

Transforms? #12

@s3ththompson

Description

@s3ththompson

Would you be open to a rewrite of nanocontent that supported arbitrary transforms (similar to sheetify)?

Feature requests such as #10 suggest that there are diverging needs between nanocontent as an in-browser content wrangler and a static site generator. Transforms could help keep the core of nanocontent simple and well-tested while encouraging others to add custom functionality on their own via custom transforms.

(Additionally, adding a custom parser is currently incompatible with using nanocontent/transform.) WDYT? (cc @jongacnik)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions