Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
89 lines (79 loc) · 3.25 KB

File metadata and controls

89 lines (79 loc) · 3.25 KB

Axiomatic Propositional Logic

An axiom system works from a set of formulas, called the axioms of the system, and a set of relations called inference rules, being of the form, "From the formulas $X_1,…,X_n$, we can infer formula $X$."

Diagramatically: $$ \frac{X_1,…,X_n}{X} $$ A proof in an axiom system consists of a finite sequence of formulas, each of which is either an axiom of the system or can be inferred from an earlier formula by the inference rules of the system.

Modus Ponens (abbreviated MP): $$ \frac{X, X \to Y}{Y} $$ Read as, "From the formulas $X$ and $X \to Y$, the formula $Y$ can be inferred."

The axiom system we will work in is a modification of $System \space \mathcal{K}$, described by Stephen Kleene [1952].

Our system shall be called $System \space \mathcal{S_0}$; it takes as primitive connectives $\neg, \and, \or, \to$, and has the following nine axiom schemes: $$ \begin{align*} &S_1: \space (X \and Y) \to Y\ &S_2: \space (X \and Y) \to X\ &S_3: \space [(X \and Y) \to Z] \to [X \to (Y \to Z)]\ &S_4: \space [(X \to Y) \and (X \to (Y \to Z))] \to (X \to Z)\ &S_5: \space X \to (X \or Y)\ &S_6: \space Y \to (X \or Y)\ &S_7: \space [(X \to Z) \and (Y \to Z)] \to ((X \or Y) \to Z)\ &S_8: \space [(X \to Y) \and (X \to \neg Y)] \to \neg X\ &S_9: \space \neg \neg X \to X\ \end{align*} $$ (0) Prove the following preliminary facts (in $System \space \mathcal{S_0}$):

$F_1$. If $\vdash X \to Y$, then $X \vdash Y$. $$ \begin{align*} &(1)\space \vdash X \to Y \quad\quad& \text{(Hypothesis)}\ &(2)\space \vdash X \quad\quad& \text{(Hypothesis)}\ &(3)\space \vdash Y \quad\quad& \text{(By 1, 2, MP)} \end{align*} $$ $F_2$. If $\vdash X \to (Y \to Z)$, then $X, Y \vdash Z$. $$ \begin{align*} &(1)\space \vdash X \to (Y \to Z) \quad\quad& \text{(Hypothesis)}\ &(2)\space \vdash X \quad\quad& \text{(Hypothesis)}\ &(3)\space \vdash Y \quad\quad& \text{(Hypothesis)}\ &(4)\space \vdash Y \to Z \quad\quad& \text{(By 1, 2, MP)}\ &(5)\space \vdash Z \quad\quad& \text{(By 3, 4, MP)} \end{align*} $$

$F_3$. $(X \and Y) \to Z \vdash X \to (Y \to Z)$ (exportation, abbreviated "Exp.") $$ \begin{align*} &(1)\space \vdash (X \and Y) \to Z \quad\quad& \text{(Hypothesis)}\ &(2)\space \vdash [X \to (Y \to Z)] \to [X \to (Y \to Z)] \quad\quad& \text{($S_3$)}\ &(3)\space \vdash X \to (Y \to Z) \quad\quad& \text{(By 1, 2, MP)} \end{align*} $$

$F_4$. If $\vdash (X \and Y) \to Z$, then $X,Y \vdash Z$. $$ \begin{align*} &(1)\space \vdash (X \and Y) \to Z \quad\quad& \text{(Hypothesis)}\ &(2)\space \vdash X \to (Y \to Z) \quad\quad& \text{(By 1, $F_3$)}\ &(3)\space X, Y \vdash Z \quad\quad& \text{(By 2, $F_2$)}\ \end{align*} $$

(1) Prove the following with axiom schemes $S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4$.

$T_1$. $\vdash X \to (Y \to Y)$ $$ \begin{align*} &(1) \space (X \and Y) \to Y \vdash X \to (Y \to Y) \quad\quad& \text{($F_3$)}\ &(2) \space \vdash (X \and Y) \to Y \quad\quad& \text{($S_1$)}\ &(3) \space \vdash X \to (Y \to Y) \quad\quad& \text{(By 2, 1, MP)} \end{align*} $$ $T_2$. $\vdash Y \to Y$ $$ \begin{align*} &(1) \space \vdash X \to (Y \to Y) \quad\quad& \text{($T_1$)}\ &(2) \space \vdash [(X \and Y) \to Y] \to (Y \to Y) \quad\quad& \text{(sub $S_1$ or any provable formula for X)}\ &(3) \space \vdash Y \to Y \quad\quad& \text{(By MP)} \end{align*} $$