Career-OS is built in public with the philosophy that job searching should feel less like playing a rigged game. Contributions welcome from anyone who's felt the pain of repetitive applications.
Better Prompts
- Industry-specific job analysis prompts
- Role-specific positioning strategies
- Quality review criteria for different career levels
Examples and Templates
- Anonymized successful applications
- Narrative examples for different backgrounds
- Worked examples of prompt sequences
Automation Improvements
- Better job posting scrapers
- Integration with job boards
- Quality validation tools
Documentation
- Clearer setup instructions
- Troubleshooting guides
- Video walkthroughs
Code Quality
- Bug fixes and error handling
- Performance improvements
- Test coverage
Features
- New automation scripts
- Better CLI interfaces
- Integration with career tools
Platform Support
- Windows/macOS/Linux compatibility
- Different Python versions
- Cloud deployment options
-
Fork the repository
-
Clone your fork:
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/career-os cd career-os -
Create development branch:
git checkout -b feature/your-improvement
-
Test your changes:
python claude-code/setup_career_os.py # Test setup python claude-code/apply_to_job.py --file examples/sample_job_analysis/sample_job.md # Test application
- Test thoroughly with multiple job types
- Provide examples of input and expected output
- Document edge cases and limitations
- Keep authentic voice - avoid corporate buzzwords
- Follow existing patterns in the codebase
- Add error handling for edge cases
- Include docstrings for new functions
- Test with sample data before submitting
- Remove all PII - use [PLACEHOLDER] format
- Include context about why the example works
- Provide variety - different industries, roles, experience levels
- Mark success metrics if known (interview rate, etc.)
Career-OS maintains an authentic, practical voice:
✅ Do: "This saves 3 hours per application" ❌ Don't: "Revolutionary AI-powered career transformation"
✅ Do: "Here's what worked for 50+ applications" ❌ Don't: "Guaranteed interview success"
✅ Do: "The system tells you when fit is poor" ❌ Don't: "Perfect for any role"
Personal Information
- Never include real names, emails, phone numbers
- Use contextual placeholders: [YOUR_NAME], [CURRENT_COMPANY]
- Sanitize all metrics:
$3.6M → $ [X.X]M
Honest Positioning
- Don't create fake achievements or experiences
- Include realistic limitations and failure modes
- Emphasize human review and judgment
Respect for Companies
- Don't encourage spam or automated submissions
- Include rate limiting and ToS compliance
- Focus on quality over quantity
What we need: Better prompts for specific situations Examples:
- Prompts for career changers
- Industry-specific analysis (fintech, healthcare, etc.)
- Executive-level positioning
How to contribute:
- Test prompts with real job postings
- Document success patterns
- Provide before/after examples
- Submit with clear use cases
What we need: Diverse, successful examples Examples:
- Different experience levels (entry, senior, executive)
- Career transitions (consultant to PM, engineer to PM)
- Industry switches
- International candidates
How to contribute:
- Anonymize completely
- Include context about success (interview rate, etc.)
- Explain what made the approach work
- Format consistently with existing examples
What we need: Better developer experience Examples:
- Improved job scraping
- Better file organization
- Integration with career tools (LinkedIn, job boards)
- Quality validation automation
How to contribute:
- Follow existing code patterns
- Add comprehensive error handling
- Include usage examples
- Test with edge cases
What we need: Clearer explanations and guides Examples:
- Video tutorials for setup
- Troubleshooting common issues
- Advanced configuration guides
- Success story compilation
How to contribute:
- Focus on practical, actionable guidance
- Include screenshots or examples
- Test instructions with fresh users
- Maintain authentic voice
## What this changes
Brief description of the improvement
## Why this matters
Connection to user pain points or system limitations
## Testing done
How you validated the changes work
## Examples included
Links to examples or test cases
## Breaking changes
Any changes that affect existing users- Initial review - maintainers check alignment with project goals
- Technical review - code quality, testing, edge cases
- User testing - validate with real job search scenarios
- Documentation review - ensure clear explanations
- Merge and release - integration with main codebase
Contributors are recognized in:
- README.md - major contributions
- Release notes - feature additions
- Examples - attribution for successful templates
- Documentation - credit for guides and improvements
- Practical experience sharing - what actually worked
- Honest assessment - including failures and limitations
- Diverse perspectives - different backgrounds and approaches
- Constructive feedback - helping improve existing content
- Generic advice - stuff you could find anywhere
- Unrealistic promises - "guaranteed success" claims
- Spam or promotion - using contributions for self-promotion
- Toxic behavior - job searching is stressful enough
- Questions: Open GitHub discussions
- Bug reports: Use issue templates
- Feature requests: Explain user impact
- Documentation: Suggest improvements
- Setup help: See QUICKSTART.md
- Advanced features: Check advanced/README.md
- Success stories: Share in discussions
- Feedback: All input helps improve the system
Career-OS exists because job searching currently sucks for candidates. Every contribution should help level the playing field by:
- Reducing repetitive work without losing personalization
- Improving quality of applications through better strategy
- Maintaining authenticity while optimizing for relevance
- Building transparency into what companies actually want
The goal isn't to game the system - it's to help good candidates showcase their actual value more effectively.
Thanks for helping build something that makes job searching feel more human. Every contribution moves us closer to a world where talent and fit matter more than keyword optimization.