Skip to content

feature: client port fowarding should be done by port name instead of port number #726

@Anmol1696

Description

@Anmol1696

Overview

If the port forwarding is done via port names, will become easier to host arbitry ports as well from local and remote.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions