Support for lazy validation?

[niksabaldun]

Is there any support for lazy validation (iterating through all errors that exist in document), or does the processing always stop at the first encountered error?

[horejsek]

Not right now. I was thinking about it already before but haven't had time to do it. :-) It needs more work as I want to keep the high speed so it needs to support both versions and not slowing down the overall performance.

[horejsek]

You don't have to close it. I would like to do that one day. Let's keep it open for other people who would be looking for that feature.

[xakiy]

Any news/progress on this feature, sir @horejsek?

[horejsek]

@xakiy Nothing was done yet. Do you want to dive in?

[xakiy]

I don't think I have the time for these few weeks ahead and I'm not sure where to start with the code. Btw, I'll try to make a PR when I'm free.

[hermfischer-wf]

Checking in again about support to iterate through all errors in a document, something equivalent to jsonschemaValidator.iter_errors(jsonobject)

[horejsek]

Hello! I just pushed a commit that makes this happen. I haven't released the new version yet. Could you help take a look and review if it would solve the needs first?

There is a new option fast_fail that is True by default, and when turned off, it collects all the errors and throws new error JsonSchemaValuesException which includes errors property with all the JsonSchemaValueException.

5f81f44