Situation
When defining two boundary_group data sources with same name prefixes I get an error:
Error: error found more than 1 group
Data sources definition:
data "boundary_group" "group1" {
name = "grp-t17-engineers"
scope_id = "o_FSBMtTyl9m"
}
data "boundary_group" "group2" {
name = "grp-t17-elevated"
scope_id = "o_FSBMtTyl9m"
}
Expected Behavior
Data sources should output information on resources based on exact name match.
Actual Behavior
If more than one Boundary group name in defined scope has the same prefix mentioned error occurs.
Steps to Reproduce
Create two groups under the same scope (in my case - groups created under the same project.) with the same name prefix. e.g.(grp-t17*):
grp-t17-elevated
grp-t17-engineers
Define data sources for both or a single group in the Terraform template and run terraform plan.
Possible root cause
In internal/provider/filter.go
[func FilterWithItemNameMatches(name string) string {
return fmt.Sprintf("\"/item/name\" matches \"%s\"", name)
}](url)
Function uses "matches" which is a regex based operator which would explain why more than one group is found even with unique group names.
"==" would make more sense to use here - https://developer.hashicorp.com/boundary/docs/filtering?utm_source=chatgpt.com#matching-operators
Situation
When defining two boundary_group data sources with same name prefixes I get an error:
Error: error found more than 1 groupData sources definition:
Expected Behavior
Data sources should output information on resources based on exact name match.
Actual Behavior
If more than one Boundary group name in defined scope has the same prefix mentioned error occurs.
Steps to Reproduce
Create two groups under the same scope (in my case - groups created under the same project.) with the same name prefix. e.g.(grp-t17*):
grp-t17-elevated
grp-t17-engineers
Define data sources for both or a single group in the Terraform template and run terraform plan.
Possible root cause
In internal/provider/filter.go
Function uses "matches" which is a regex based operator which would explain why more than one group is found even with unique group names.
"==" would make more sense to use here - https://developer.hashicorp.com/boundary/docs/filtering?utm_source=chatgpt.com#matching-operators