Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 18, 2021. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 18, 2021. It is now read-only.

Question: Feasible to support volume mounts?  #90

@justinfx

Description

@justinfx

The request for Openfaas to directly allow volume mount options has been met with resistance (i.e. github.com/openfaas/faas/issues/320). But I wanted to know whether it would be a possibility for this provider plugin to extend access to the Nomad Job group settings in a way that volume and volume mount options could be passed in? Maybe through annotations? I figured if Openfaas wants to remain opinionated that a user should not be allowed to use mounts in a function, that is no reason that Nomad couldn't still remain flexible to the needs of users.

Thoughts?

For context, I have been evaluating different faas frameworks for a solution on top of k8s. But Nomad seems to suit some challenges at my studio. I was moving down the path of using Fission on k8s but now want to see whether Nomad can be an option, and reconsider using openfaas again (was my first choice) if volume mounting is no longer a problem.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions