Skip to content

Variable names in adaptors use standard x, q variable names should be more descriptive #37

@ketanbj

Description

@ketanbj

Describe the bug

Comments explaning the semantics of each attribute would be appreciated as well as more descriptive names. I can't understand what m, for example, is just reading the code.

To Reproduce

Look at the implementation

Expected behavior

x and q should be explained better

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions