Skip to content

species authorship causes GBIF accepted infraspecific taxon not being matched? #116

@abubelinha

Description

@abubelinha

This is the GBIF backbone accepted taxon: https://www.gbif.org/species/7423643
I am passing 11 as data source:

Thanks
@abubelinha


EDIT:
I constructed the above queries from the verifier.globalnames.org interface form textarea, and selected output=JSON
That gave the results I linked above (containing a names= parameter).
Now that I went to the api interface I am a bit confused since I don't see which form should I use how to construct the exact same output.

Instead, I see a verifications/names menu entry which seems to work better and match the name I was looking for.

https://verifier.globalnames.org/api/v1/verifications/Linaria%20polygalifolia%20Hoffmanns.%20%26%20Link%20subsp.%20aguillonensis%20%28Garc%C3%ADa%20Mart.%29%20Castrov.%20%26%20Lago?data_sources=11&all_matches=true&capitalize=false&species_group=false&fuzzy_uninomial=false&stats=false&main_taxon_threshold=0.5

Could you explain those differences?


EDIT:
gbif-api species/match issue with the same taxon name
Same problem. Just out of curiosity, do GBIF and gnames match names in a similar way?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions