🏥 Safe Output Health Report - December 7, 2025 #5706
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 3 days ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of safe output job health across all agentic workflows over the last 24 hours. Key finding: 100% success rate with zero failures detected.
Executive Summary
The safe output system demonstrates excellent health with perfect execution across all job types. Out of 49 workflow runs analyzed, 47 included safe output jobs. All executed jobs completed successfully with no errors or failures.
Key Metrics:
Detailed Analysis
Safe Output Job Statistics
The following table shows execution statistics for each safe output job type:
Job Type Analysis
Most Active Job Types:
Job Execution Patterns:
Workflow Distribution
Safe output jobs were distributed across various workflows:
Top Workflows with Safe Outputs:
Error and Warning Analysis
Safe Output Job Errors
✅ No errors or failures detected in any safe output job.
All 31 executed safe output jobs completed successfully with no exceptions, API failures, or data validation errors.
Agent Execution Errors (Not Affecting Safe Outputs)
While safe output jobs were perfect, some errors were detected in agent execution:
Top Error Patterns:
MCP Serena Startup Failure (8 occurrences)
spawn uvx ENOENT - Failed to start MCP client for serenaJSON Parsing Errors (12 occurrences)
Unexpected token '#', "### Ran Pl"... is not valid JSONPermission Warnings (73 occurrences)
Permission denied and could not request permission from userEventEmitter Memory Leak Warning (12 occurrences)
MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detectedMissing Tools
5 reports of missing Go toolchain:
make fmt,make lint,make testcommandsHigh Skip Rate Analysis
68.7% of safe output jobs were skipped (68/99), which is expected and healthy behavior:
Reasons for Skipping:
Examples of Proper Skipping:
This high skip rate demonstrates that:
Performance Metrics
Average Execution Time by Job Type:
Observations:
push_to_pull_request_branchtakes longer (average 66s) due to git operationsHistorical Context
This is the first systematic audit of safe output job health. Future audits will enable:
Cache Memory Location:
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/safe-output-health/2025-12-07.jsonKey Findings
Recommendations
Immediate Actions
None required. The safe output system is operating at peak health with no issues to address.
Process Improvements
Future Enhancements
MCP Serena Fix (Low Priority)
uvxcommandPermission Warning Reduction (Low Priority)
JSON Parsing Robustness (Low Priority)
Conclusion
The safe output system demonstrates excellent health with perfect execution across all job types. The 100% success rate, zero failures, and consistent performance indicate a robust and reliable system. The high skip rate is expected behavior and demonstrates proper conditional logic.
Overall Health Status: 🟢 EXCELLENT
Continue daily monitoring to maintain this level of reliability and establish long-term baseline metrics.
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions