🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 20, 2025 #4367
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 week ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 20, 2025
Executive Summary
Over the past 24 hours, the gh-aw repository executed 77 agentic workflow runs across 28 distinct workflows, achieving a success rate of 79.22%. While the overall system health is good, several areas require attention including MCP server failures, missing tool requests, and specific workflows showing reliability issues.
Key Highlights:
📈 Workflow Health Trends
Success/Failure Patterns
The trend chart shows workflow health over the past 4 days. Success rates have remained relatively stable around 78-79%, with November 19th showing the highest activity (45 total runs). The failure count peaked on November 19th with 11 failures, but recovered to 5 failures on November 20th. The consistent success rate above 75% indicates overall system stability despite occasional failures.
Token Usage & Costs
Token usage and cost data is currently not being captured in workflow metrics (all values are zero). This is a data collection issue that should be addressed to enable cost tracking and optimization. Without token usage data, we cannot identify expensive workflows or track cost trends over time.
Full Audit Details
Audit Period
Statistics Summary
Missing Tools
Missing tool requests indicate functionality that workflows attempted to use but was not available. This requires investigation to determine if these are legitimate needs or configuration issues.
Analysis: The Playwright tool was requested 3 times by the Smoke Copilot workflow. This appears to be intentional testing of the Playwright MCP server integration. The workflow is attempting to verify that the Playwright MCP server can be used for browser automation tasks.
Recommendation:
MCP Server Failures
MCP server failures indicate issues connecting to or using Model Context Protocol servers during workflow execution.
Analysis: The Playwright MCP server experienced connection or initialization failures in 2 workflow runs:
These failures are directly correlated with the missing tool requests, suggesting the Playwright MCP server is either:
Recommendation:
Workflow Performance Breakdown
Top Performers (100% Success Rate)
Workflows with perfect success rates in the last 24 hours:
Workflows with Failures
Workflows that experienced failures and need attention:
Critical Workflows (100% Failure Rate)
These workflows failed every execution in the past 24 hours and require immediate investigation:
Affected Workflows Detail
High Priority Issues
1. Smoke Test Instability
The Smoke test workflows (designed to verify basic functionality across all three AI engines) are showing concerning failure rates:
Failed runs:
2. Tidy Workflow Failures
The Tidy workflow (automatic code cleanup) had 2 failures out of 10 runs:
3. Changeset Generator Issues
The Changeset Generator failed 2 out of 5 runs (40% failure rate):
Data Collection Issues
Missing Metrics
The audit revealed that token usage and cost data is not being captured in workflow runs. All runs show:
TokenUsage: 0EstimatedCost: 0.0Turns: 0This is a significant gap in observability and prevents:
Recommendation: Investigate why workflow metrics are not being populated and implement proper token/cost tracking.
Recommendations
Immediate Actions (Critical Priority)
Investigate Critical Workflow Failures
Fix Playwright MCP Server
Enable Metrics Collection
Short-term Actions (High Priority)
Improve Smoke Test Reliability
Monitor Unstable Workflows
Add Alerting
Long-term Improvements
Enhance Observability
Optimize Costs
Improve Documentation
Historical Context
This is the first audit using the comprehensive log analysis system. Historical comparison data will be available in future audits as we build up trend data over time.
From the cache memory, we found extensive audit history dating back to October 12, 2025, with daily audits showing:
Future audits will include historical trend analysis to identify:
Next Steps
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions