🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 14, 2025 #3910
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 week ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Agentic Workflow Audit Report - November 14, 2025
This audit analyzed 83 workflow runs from the last 24 hours across the githubnext/gh-aw repository. While the overall success rate stands at 78.3%, the analysis identified several recurring error patterns and 12 failed workflows that require attention. The Changeset Generator workflow is the primary concern with 5 failures, representing 42% of all failures.
Key findings include 388 unique error patterns, with "Get my user profile" errors appearing 324 times across multiple workflows. Token consumption totaled 12.5M tokens at a cost of $10.42, with November 13th showing peak usage. No missing tools or MCP server failures were detected during this period.
📈 Workflow Health Trends
Success/Failure Patterns
The chart reveals concerning volatility in workflow health. November 11-13 maintained strong performance with success rates of 80-85%, but November 14 shows a sharp decline to 50% success rate. This represents a 35-percentage-point drop that requires immediate investigation. The increase in failed runs on November 14 (2 failures vs. 0-1 in previous days) suggests either environmental changes or newly introduced issues.
Token Usage & Costs
Token consumption exhibits a clear peak pattern on November 13 with 9.6M tokens used, costing $8.60. This represents an 18x increase from November 11's baseline. The spike correlates with 60 workflow runs on that day, suggesting high-volume activity rather than individual workflow inefficiency. Daily costs range from $0.22 to $8.60, with an average of approximately $2.60 per day across the period.
Full Audit Report
Audit Summary
Performance Metrics
🚨 Critical Issues
1. High-Frequency Error: "Get my user profile"
Impact: 324 occurrences across 2 workflows
Affected Workflows:
Analysis: This error appears to be related to GitHub API authentication or permission issues when attempting to retrieve user profile information. The high frequency (324 occurrences) suggests this is a recurring problem that's not being properly handled or retried.
Sample Run IDs: §19322190778, §19334136608
Recommendation:
2. JavaScript Error Handling
Impact: 12 occurrences
Affected Workflows:
Error Pattern:
} catch (error) {Analysis: This suggests incomplete or malformed error handling in JavaScript/TypeScript code. The error message itself appearing in logs indicates the code structure is being logged rather than properly handled.
Sample Run IDs: §19349763797
Recommendation:
3. Permission Denied Warnings
Impact: 10 occurrences across 3 workflows
Affected Workflows:
Analysis: Workflows are encountering permission issues that cannot be resolved through user prompts (likely due to automated execution context). This suggests insufficient permissions in workflow configuration or GitHub token scope.
Recommendation:
4. Outdated Lock Files
Impact: 9 occurrences
Affected Workflows:
Warning: Lock file is outdated compared to workflow file modifications
Analysis: The compiled
.lock.ymlfiles are out of sync with their source.mdworkflow files. This can lead to workflows running with outdated configurations.Recommendation:
5. Squid Proxy Configuration Issues
Impact: 16 occurrences (8 each for two related warnings)
Affected Workflows:
Warnings:
Analysis: Squid proxy configuration warnings suggest firewall/proxy setup issues that may affect external HTTP requests.
Recommendation:
📊 Failed Workflow Analysis
Most Problematic Workflow: Changeset Generator
Failure Count: 5 out of 12 total failures (42%)
Recent Failures:
Pattern: Consistent failures throughout the day with roughly 2-4 hour intervals
Priority: HIGH - This workflow requires immediate investigation
Other Failed Workflows
🎯 Top 10 Error Patterns
✅ Positive Findings
No Missing Tools
Status: ✅ Clean
No workflows reported missing tools during this audit period. This indicates that the tool ecosystem is well-configured and meeting workflow requirements.
No MCP Server Failures
Status: ✅ Clean
All MCP server connections were successful with no reported failures. This demonstrates stable MCP server infrastructure.
High Success Rate
Status:⚠️ Acceptable but declining
While 78.3% overall success rate is acceptable, the sharp drop on November 14 to 50% is concerning and requires attention.
📋 Recommendations
Immediate Actions (Priority: HIGH)
Investigate Changeset Generator - With 5 failures in 18 hours, this workflow needs urgent debugging
Fix "Get my user profile" Authentication Issue - 324 occurrences is excessive
Address Permission Denied Errors
Short-term Actions (Priority: MEDIUM)
Implement Lock File Freshness Checks
Fix Squid Proxy Configuration
Investigate Duplicate Code Detector Failures
Long-term Actions (Priority: LOW)
Implement Error Pattern Monitoring
Optimize Token Usage
Improve Memory Leak Prevention
📈 Historical Context
This is the first audit in the series. Future audits will compare trends against this baseline to identify:
🔄 Next Audit
The next audit will run in 24 hours and will focus on:
📁 Audit Data
All audit data has been stored in the cache memory at:
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/2025-11-14.json/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/index.json/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/audits/report_data.jsonReferences:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions