🔍 Static Analysis Report - November 5, 2025 #3280
Closed
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
/plan |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 1 week ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔍 Static Analysis Report - November 5, 2025
Today's automated static analysis scan of all agentic workflows has been completed using three industry-standard security and code quality tools: zizmor, poutine, and actionlint.
Analysis Summary
Findings by Tool
Key Findings
Good news: No critical, high, or medium severity security issues were found. All findings are either Low severity or Informational/Note level, indicating code quality improvements rather than urgent security vulnerabilities.
1. Zizmor Security Findings (2 findings)
template-injection
Affected Workflows:
.github/workflows/copilot-session-insights.lock.yml.github/workflows/mcp-inspector.lock.ymlAnalysis: Both findings involve template expressions that reference other step outputs or environment variables. The risk is Low/Informational because:
copilot-session-insightsuses${{ steps.install-extension.outputs.EXTENSION_INSTALLED }}in a warning messagemcp-inspectoruses${{ env.SENTRY_HOST }}in MCP server configurationThese are internal references within the same workflow and not directly controllable by external attackers. However, it's good practice to be aware of template injection risks.
2. Poutine Supply Chain Findings (6 findings)
unpinnable_action (3 occurrences)
Affected Files:
.github/actions/daily-perf-improver/build-steps/action.yml.github/actions/daily-test-improver/coverage-steps/action.ymlpkg/workflow/js/node_modules/@actions/github-script/.github/actions/install-dependencies/action.ymlAnalysis: These are local composite actions that reference other actions. Since they're part of our repository, the risk is minimal.
github_action_from_unverified_creator_used (3 occurrences)
Affected Actions:
astral-sh/setup-uv(Python package manager tooling)cli/gh-extension-precompile(GitHub CLI extension)golangci/golangci-lint-action(Go linting)Analysis: While these actions are from unverified creators, they are:
The risk is Low as we pin to specific commits and these are well-maintained projects.
3. Actionlint Linting Issues (108 findings)
shellcheck - SC2086: Unquoted Variables
Most Common Patterns:
${GITHUB_WORKSPACE}/scripts/ci/cleanup.sh- unquoted variable in path (52 occurrences)Affected Workflows (19 total):
Example Issues:
Detailed Fix Suggestion: Shellcheck SC2086
The most common issue (93% of all findings) is SC2086: unquoted shell variables. I've created a comprehensive fix template for this issue.
Fix Template for SC2086 (Click to expand)
Problem
Unquoted variables can lead to:
*,?,[]expand as patternsSolution
Add double quotes around all variable expansions:
Automated Fix Script
Testing Steps
gh aw compile --actionlintdocker run --rm -v "$(pwd):/workdir" -w /workdir rhysd/actionlint:latest .github/workflows/*.lock.ymlReference
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/fix-templates/actionlint-shellcheck-sc2086.mdRecommendations
🟢 Low Priority (Information & Notes)
These findings don't represent security vulnerabilities but are code quality improvements:
Quote Shell Variables (108 occurrences)
Review Unverified Actions (3 actions)
Template Injection Awareness (2 occurrences)
✅ No Immediate Action Required
Historical Context
This is the first automated static analysis scan tracked in the cache memory system. Future scans will include:
Next Steps
gh aw compile --actionlintafter fixing shell quoting issuesCache Storage
All scan data has been stored in
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/security-scans/for historical tracking and trend analysis:2025-11-05.jsonindex.json/fix-templates/actionlint-shellcheck-sc2086.mdScan Metadata:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions