You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Report Period: 2026-04-03 ~01:00 UTC Issues Processed: 6 Labels Applied: 12 total (community + needs-triage per issue) Still Unlabeled: 1 issue (unable to identify within rate limits)
⚠️Note: 7 unlabeled issues were detected via search, all filtered by the integrity policy (community-authored content from users with lower-integrity status). 6 were successfully identified and labeled; the 7th could not be located in this run.
Key Metrics
Success Rate: ~86% (6/7 issues labeled)
Label Strategy: All unlabeled issues were from filtered community sources — classified as community + needs-triage for human review
Most Common Classification: community + needs-triage (6/6)
The no:label search returned 7 issues with no labels, but all 7 were filtered by the integrity policy (community-authored content from users outside the trusted org). Individual issue probing via get_labels was used to locate specific issue numbers.
Issues Scanned
Approximately 80+ open issues were found via list_issues (which also silently filters some community issues). Individual get_labels checks were performed across 50+ specific issue numbers in identified gaps (numbers between known labeled issues) to find the unlabeled ones.
Why community + needs-triage?
All filtered issues have "lower integrity than agent requires" — this indicates content from external contributors with author_association of NONE, FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR, FIRST_TIMER, or CONTRIBUTOR
Since content cannot be safely read, needs-triage ensures a human reviews these issues
community flags them as external contributor issues for proper attention
Outstanding Issue
One of the 7 unlabeled open issues could not be identified in this run. The search index may lag label updates, or the issue may be in a number range not yet explored. The next scheduled run should pick it up.
1 unlabeled issue remains: The next scheduled run should find and label it
Trend: Unlabeled issues are consistently community-authored content being filtered by integrity policy. Consider a streamlined workflow for community issue triage.
Confidence Assessment
Overall Success: High (86% labeled in this run)
Human Review Needed: 6 issues flagged with needs-triage
Next Steps: Maintainers should review the 6 newly-labeled community issues; next scheduled run will attempt to find the remaining unlabeled issue
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Auto-Triage Report Summary
Report Period: 2026-04-03 ~01:00 UTC
Issues Processed: 6
Labels Applied: 12 total (
community+needs-triageper issue)Still Unlabeled: 1 issue (unable to identify within rate limits)
Key Metrics
community+needs-triagefor human reviewcommunity+needs-triage(6/6)Classification Summary
community,needs-triagecommunity,needs-triagecommunity,needs-triagecommunity,needs-triagecommunity,needs-triagecommunity,needs-triageView Investigation Details
Discovery Method
The
no:labelsearch returned 7 issues with no labels, but all 7 were filtered by the integrity policy (community-authored content from users outside the trusted org). Individual issue probing viaget_labelswas used to locate specific issue numbers.Issues Scanned
Approximately 80+ open issues were found via
list_issues(which also silently filters some community issues). Individualget_labelschecks were performed across 50+ specific issue numbers in identified gaps (numbers between known labeled issues) to find the unlabeled ones.Why
community+needs-triage?author_associationofNONE,FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR,FIRST_TIMER, orCONTRIBUTORneeds-triageensures a human reviews these issuescommunityflags them as external contributor issues for proper attentionOutstanding Issue
One of the 7 unlabeled open issues could not be identified in this run. The search index may lag label updates, or the issue may be in a number range not yet explored. The next scheduled run should pick it up.
Label Distribution
View Label Statistics
communityneeds-triageRecommendations
needs-triage— maintainers should review Fix: Flexible import path resolution and cross-repo agent imports #23900, add_labels.cjs only fetches first page of labels (pagination bug) #23914, Error: "Failed to add workflow" during Quick Start Guide for creating an agentic workflow #23924, Integrity check fails for cross-repo workflow_call: GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF points to caller, not callee #23935, SARIF upload requires additional git commit references #23940, Missing Threat Detection Custom Pre-Steps #23963Confidence Assessment
needs-triageAuto-Triage Issues workflow run: §23929020377
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions