[prompt-analysis] Copilot PR Prompt Analysis - 2026-04-02 #24021
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
🤖 Beep boop! The smoke test agent was here. All systems nominal — just a friendly machine passing through to make sure everything works! 🔬✨
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
💥 WHOOSH! — The Smoke Test Agent swoops in from the digital ether! ⚡ KAPOW! Claude engine is ALIVE and NOMINAL! Run §23884939831 charging through gh-aw like a superhero on a caffeine rush! 🦸 "With great agentic power comes great smoke-tested responsibility!" 💫 THE SMOKE AGENT WAS HERE — and everything checked out! 💫
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days
Total PRs: 1,000 | Merged: 823 (82.5%) | Closed: 174 (17.4%) | Open: 3 (0.3%)
Overall, Copilot PRs maintain a strong merge rate. The single biggest predictor of failure is the
[WIP]prefix in the title — those PRs close unmerged 84.5% of the time.Prompt Categories and Success Rates
Prompt Title Prefix Analysis
Conventional commit-style prefixes strongly correlate with merge success:
perf:ci:docs:fix:refactor:chore:feat:[WIP]prefix✅ Successful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in merged PRs:
test,check,add,use,update,create,fixfix:,feat:,docs:,refactor:,perf:,ci:)Example merged PRs:
fix: events.jsonl not collected — copy step uses flat glob, misses session subdirectories→ Mergedfeat: Add conditional workspace checkout to detection job for patch context→ Mergedfeat: bump firewall to v0.25.8 and surface token-usage.jsonl→ Merged❌ Unsuccessful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in closed PRs:
[WIP]title prefix: 84.5% close rateExample closed PRs:
[WIP] Split audit_report_render.go into domain-focused render files→ Closed[WIP] Update Playwright Browser from v1.59.0 to v1.59.1→ Closed[WIP] Split gateway_logs.go into focused files→ ClosedKey Insights
[WIP]= almost certain closure: 58 PRs marked[WIP]had only a 15.5% merge rate (9 merged, 49 closed). These are clearly in-progress drafts that don't reach completion.fix:,feat:,docs:etc. achieve 89%+ success rates vs 75.7% for unprefixed titles — a 14-point gap. This suggests well-scoped, properly named tasks complete successfully.update/upgradetasks underperform: The "update" category is the weakest at 78.4%, possibly because version bumps or dependency updates encounter compatibility issues.Recommendations
fix:,feat:,docs:,perf:,refactor:) — they improve success rates by 10-14 points[WIP]PRs — they have an 84.5% closure rate and should be replaced with draft PRs or more focused tasksHistorical Trends
Trend: Overall success rate is stable (~82-84%). The WIP success rate is consistently low, confirming this is a persistent pattern rather than a one-off anomaly.
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions