[copilot-session-insights] Daily Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-03-26 #23104
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot Session Insights. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #23230. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Key Metrics
📈 Session Trends Analysis
Completion Patterns
Completion rates have shown a sharp decline after the strong period of late February/early March 2026, where rates routinely hit 80–100%. Since mid-March, daily rates have dropped to single digits on most days, with the all-time 14-day average now at 20.1% vs. the all-time average of 43.3%. The predominance of
action_requiredconclusions (review agents awaiting human merge decisions) is the primary structural driver of the low overall rate — this is expected behavior, not a failure signal.Duration & Efficiency
Copilot agent session durations remain relatively stable around a median of 9.6 min. The notable outlier on 2026-02-27 (40.3 min) appears to be a one-off long-running task. Today's two sessions (11.8 min and 5.9 min) are well within the normal range. The all-time mean duration is 11.0 min, suggesting consistent task scope.
Branch Activity — Today
copilot/refactor-write-count-calculation — 27 sessions, 79.8 min window
Running Copilot coding agent— ✅ success (11.8 min, 08:49–09:01 UTC)action_required(rounds 2 & 3)copilot/sub-pr-23074 — 12 sessions, 28.4 min window
Addressing comment on PR #23075— ✅ success (5.9 min, 08:11–08:17 UTC)action_requiredcopilot/fix-env-expression-rejection — 8 sessions, 3.1 min window
action_requiredSuccess Factors ✅
PR Comment Response Pattern: Short, focused tasks (PR comment responses) continue to have very high success rates. Today's 5.9 min response to PR fix: remove double-counted write_actions from partially_reducible evidence; rename Minutes → Action Minutes #23075 is a clean example — single-shot completion with no retries.
Refactor Tasks with Clear Scope: The
refactor-write-count-calculationtask completed in 11.8 min with no agent retries. Refactor branches with specific, bounded change targets ("write count calculation") tend to succeed in single runs.Consistent Duration Profile: Agent runs today (5.9 and 11.8 min) align closely with the historical median (9.6 min), suggesting the agent is not experiencing excessive loops or context confusion.
Failure Signals⚠️
AI Moderator Failure on Refactor Branch: The
AI Moderatorworkflow failed oncopilot/refactor-write-count-calculation. This is an unusual signal — suggests the PR content may have triggered moderation heuristics. Worth monitoring on future refactor branches to determine if this is a false positive or a structural issue with the PR description format.CI Failures on fix-env-expression-rejection: CI failed without a visible copilot agent response in the analysis window. This may indicate the agent has not yet been triggered to address the failure, or that the fix requires investigation beyond automated correction.
Declining 7-day Copilot Success Rate: The last 7-day rate (56.0%) is notably below the all-time rate (64.8%). Recent days (2026-03-23 to 2026-03-25) showed
in_progresssessions at analysis time and low success counts. Some of this is measurement artifact (sessions captured mid-run), but the trend warrants continued monitoring.Notable Observations
Loop Detection
refactor-write-count-calculationis expected behavior (push → review → revision push → review again), not a loopTool Usage Patterns (inferred from session metadata)
created_attimestamp) — efficient parallelismModeration Activity
Content Moderationagent succeeded whileAI Moderatorfailed — likely a transient failure or backend issue.Trends Over Time
The last 7-day copilot success rate (56%) is 8.8 points below the all-time average. However, today's 100% success breaks a recent streak of low-activity/in-progress days. The very low overall completion rates (8–16%) in the last 7 days are primarily driven by the high volume of
action_requiredreview agent sessions awaiting human action — not actual failures.Actionable Recommendations
For Users Writing Task Descriptions
refactor-write-count-calculationcorrelate with single-shot success. Vague scope (e.g.,fix-*without context) risks CI failures without clear recovery paths.Addressing comment on PR #23075pattern provides the agent with unambiguous context, enabling fast (5.9 min) completions.For System Improvements
refactor-write-count-calculation. If this is a false positive rate issue, consider raising the threshold or adding a retry mechanism.Statistical Summary
Next Steps
fix-env-expression-rejection— does a copilot agent run address the CI failure?References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions