📊 Claude Token Usage Report2026-04-02

[github-actions]

Overview

Period: 2026-04-02T21:10Z (last 24 hours, since previous report at 17:26Z)
Runs analyzed: 1 of 1 Claude-engine workflow run
Total tokens: 79K across all workflows
Estimated total cost: $0.18

One Claude-engine workflow ran during this period: Secret Digger (Claude) — its first appearance in token tracking reports. No smoke-claude or security-guard runs occurred since the previous report.

---

Workflow Summary

Workflow	Runs	Total Tokens	Cost	Cache Rate	I/O Ratio	Top Model
secret-digger-claude	1	79K	$0.18	99.7%	31:1	sonnet-4.6

---

🔍 Optimization Opportunities

1. ℹ️ secret-digger-claude — High cache write rate (50.6%) — This is expected for a short 3-request conversation (1 haiku + 2 sonnet turns). The first sonnet turn writes 38K cache tokens; the second reads them back at 99.7% hit rate. Pattern is healthy for a 2-turn agent run.

   • Recommendation: No action needed. If the workflow grows to more turns, cache reuse ratio (read/write) will improve further.

2. ℹ️ No cache on haiku requests — The initial haiku classification call has zero cache tokens. At 123 input tokens and $0.0005 cost, this is negligible.

   • Recommendation: Low priority. Add cache breakpoints only if haiku usage scales to >20 requests/run.

---

Per-Workflow Details

secret-digger-claude

• Run: §23920074040 — main branch
• Requests: 3 total
• Models: claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 (1 req), claude-sonnet-4-6 (2 reqs)
• Tokens: 79K total (127 input, 1,230 output, 38,275 cache_read, 39,376 cache_write)
• Cache hit rate: 99.7%
• Cache write rate: 50.6%
• I/O ratio: 31:1
• Avg latency: 10,547ms/request
• Estimated cost: $0.18

Request breakdown:

#	Model	Input	Output	Cache Read	Cache Write	Duration
1	haiku-4-5	123	95	0	0	1,261ms
2	sonnet-4-6	3	1,082	0	38,275	27,542ms
3	sonnet-4-6	1	53	38,275	1,101	2,837ms

Cost breakdown:

• Sonnet cache writes: $0.16 (88%)
• Sonnet cache reads: $0.01 (7%)
• Sonnet output: $0.02 (11%)
• Haiku (all): $0.0005 (<1%)

Workflows Without Token Data

The following Claude-engine workflows did not run during this period:

• smoke-claude — 0 runs since last report
• security-guard — 0 runs since last report
• security-review — 0 runs since last report

Agentic Maintenance (run §23921352791) ran but had no agent-artifacts — it does not use --enable-api-proxy.

---

Historical Trend

Previous report: 📊 Claude Token Usage Report 2026-04-02 (issue #1606, created 2026-04-02T17:26Z)

Baseline from previous report (smoke-claude):

• Per-run cost: ~$0.24 | Per-run tokens: ~203K | Cache hit rate: ~99.5%

secret-digger-claude is a new workflow in token tracking — no prior baseline to compare against. Its first run shows healthy caching behavior and a cost of $0.18.

Comparison:

Metric	smoke-claude (prev)	secret-digger-claude (new)
Tokens/run	~203K	~79K
Cost/run	~$0.24	$0.18
Cache hit rate	~99.5%	99.7%
Requests/run	~6	3

secret-digger-claude is significantly more token-efficient per run than smoke-claude, likely because it performs a narrower task in fewer turns.

---

Previous Report

📊 Claude Token Usage Report 2026-04-02 — Issue #1606

References:

• §23920074040 — Secret Digger (Claude), main branch
• §23912847831 — Previous analyzer run

Generated by Daily Claude Token Usage Analyzer · ◷