chore(ci): Fixing CI

[fclairamb]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.88%. Comparing base (1962e01) to head (e2ad580).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #593   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.88%   86.88%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        1761     1761           
=======================================
  Hits         1530     1530           
  Misses        155      155           
  Partials       76       76           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[claude]

Code Review: PR #593 - Fixing CI

Summary

This PR updates the actions/checkout action from v5 to v6 in two workflow files. The changes are minimal and focused on dependency updates.

✅ Positive Findings

1. Correct Version Update: The update to actions/checkout@v6.0.1 in build.yml and actions/checkout@v6 in claude.yml follows GitHub Actions best practices for staying current with action versions.

2. Consistent Parameters: The fetch-depth: 1 parameter is appropriately maintained in both workflows, which is optimal for CI/CD scenarios where full history isn't needed.

3. Minimal Scope: The PR correctly limits changes to only the checkout action versions, reducing risk.

⚠️ Issues Found

Critical: Inconsistent Version Usage Across Repository

The PR updates two workflow files but misses a third file that still uses v5:

• ✅ .github/workflows/build.yml → Updated to v6.0.1
• ✅ .github/workflows/claude.yml → Updated to v6
• ❌ .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml → Still using v5 (line 30)

Recommendation: Update .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml:30 to actions/checkout@v6 for consistency across all workflows.

Minor: Version Specification Inconsistency

The PR uses two different version formats:

• build.yml: actions/checkout@v6.0.1 (specific patch version)
• claude.yml: actions/checkout@v6 (major version only)

While both are valid, using the same format across all workflows improves consistency and maintainability.

Recommendation: Choose one approach:

• Option A (Recommended): Use @v6 in all files for automatic minor/patch updates
• Option B: Use @v6.0.1 in all files for explicit version pinning

Code Quality & Best Practices

• ✅ No Breaking Changes: The v5 → v6 upgrade path for actions/checkout is backward compatible
• ✅ Permissions: Existing workflow permissions are appropriate and unchanged
• ✅ No Security Concerns: The update addresses potential security fixes in newer action versions

Performance Considerations

• ✅ No performance impact expected; actions/checkout@v6 maintains similar performance characteristics to v5

Test Coverage

• ⚠️ Missing Workflow: The incomplete update to claude-code-review.yml means this workflow hasn't been tested with v6
• ℹ️ Consider verifying all workflows run successfully after the complete update

Suggested Changes

# In .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml, line 30:
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
+ uses: actions/checkout@v6

For consistency with claude.yml, or use @v6.0.1 if you prefer explicit versioning (matching build.yml).

Summary of Recommendations

1. Must Fix: Update claude-code-review.yml to use actions/checkout@v6 for complete consistency
2. Should Fix: Standardize version format across all three files (either @v6 or @v6.0.1)
3. Nice to Have: Add a comment in the PR description explaining the reason for the update (security, features, bug fixes, etc.)

Overall, this is a straightforward dependency update that's well-executed but incomplete. Once the third workflow file is updated and version formatting is standardized, this will be ready to merge.

---

Review conducted following the repository's CLAUDE.md conventions for code quality and best practices.