fine tune vicregl to coco object detection

[chos1npc]

Thank you for your excellent contributions and ideas. I have attempted to fine-tune the checkpoint you provided to downstream detection tasks. Using VICReg, I achieved an mAP of 38.0, but with VICRegL, I got 35.5. I followed the common practices and used Detectron2's R_50_FPN_1x.yaml for training. I would like to ask if these results are reasonable?

Would you like to further discuss the specifics of the downstream task and the performance differences between VICReg and VICRegL?