Logo

[Kiefersv]

My first draft and suggestion for a logo. Please feel free to comment and criticize.

[AaronDavidSchneider]

nice and easy logo! Really like it! Should we use gcmt as the name?

[Kiefersv]

Like this?

[AaronDavidSchneider]

I think, I prefer the second one. But I don't mind :D
Thanks for the effort!

[Kiefersv]

I slightly prefer the upper of the two. @robinbaeyens you are the tie breaker now :D (or you can completely disagree of course)

Afterwards, we have to create the logo in a proper software since this is only done in libre office and has many small mistakes in it.

[robinbaeyens]

I actually preferred GCMtoolkit! It is much more descriptive than gcmt.
But from the gcmt-logo's I like the second a little bit more I guess, sorry Sven ;)

[AaronDavidSchneider]

How about we name it GCMtoolkit and the python package is just called gcmt? Is this too confusing? We could also still name it gcmtoolkit? I agree with you @robinbaeyens that gcmt is less descriptive.

[robinbaeyens]

I don't think it's too confusing to have both GCMtoolkit and gcmt, although the preference would probably be to have everything named the same (i.e. GCMtoolkit). But is it worth it to go through the name changes in the code? Not sure :)

[AaronDavidSchneider]

I honestly don't care... I can do it on Thursday, if you want me to?

[Kiefersv]

I like @robinbaeyens idea for the logo and the name change. It is helpful if it is descriptive (but also don't have a strong opinion on this). Only thing we then need to discuss is the camel case: GCMtoolkit, GCMToolKit, GCMToolkit or GCMtoolKit.

I will see that I can get a proper version of the logo and will write once I have a it :D

[AaronDavidSchneider]

I think python is usually snakecase instead of camelcase. So how about gcm_toolkit ?

[robinbaeyens]

So how about gcm_toolkit ?

Excellent!

I honestly don't care...

In Dutch we say: "Als 't kind maar een naam heeft" (as long as the child has a name... )

[Kiefersv]

I'm not a big fan of the underscore in the name, but gcm toolkit would be fine with me. We don't need to be precise with the python syntax in the name, but I had programmer friends of mine pointing it out when they first saw it. So how about this one:

.

[AaronDavidSchneider]

I guess you cant have a whitespace in a python package. But I am fine with the whitespace in the logo and maybe even the docs and stuff, and then just using the underscore for the pythonpackage? But this in the end would maybe again be kind of incoherent?!
What do you guys think?

[Kiefersv]

I think only in the logo it looks wired, everywhere else is the underscore fine