chore: Bump github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto only #3008
Conversation
|
The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow CI / buf-check (pull_request).
|
|
Claude finished @alpe's task in 1m 41s —— View job Code Review CompleteI've reviewed this dependency bump PR for SummaryThis PR bumps
Code Quality & Architecture ✅Positive observations:
Modular structure:
Dependency Analysis 🔍About gnark-crypto:
Version changes:
Security Considerations 🔒Low risk assessment:
Recommendation:
Testing & Reliability 🧪CI Status:
Test coverage:
CI failure to address:
Performance & Resource Efficiency ⚡Expected impact:
Documentation & Maintenance 📚What's good:
Suggestions:
RecommendationsBefore merging:
Post-merge monitoring:
VerdictApproval: ✅ Recommended for merge after CI passes This is a well-executed dependency bump with proper consistency across all modules. The changes are minimal, focused, and follow the repository's modular structure correctly. The only issue is the semantic PR title check failure, which is a process/tooling matter, not a code quality issue. Risk Level: Low |
Summary of ChangesHello @alpe, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on a routine dependency update, specifically bumping the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
alpe
changed the title
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3008 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 57.96% 57.89% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 110 110
Lines 10526 10526
==========================================
- Hits 6101 6094 -7
- Misses 3774 3781 +7
Partials 651 651
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully updates the github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto dependency across multiple go.mod and go.sum files. The changes are straightforward dependency bumps and corresponding checksum updates, which align with the pull request's stated objective. No functional changes or new issues were introduced.
Bump github.com/consensys/gnark-crypto only