Consider adding articles about client diversity from Kiln

[aimxhaisse]

We wrote a series of research/articles on client diversity which could have a place here:

• https://www.kiln.fi/post/ethereum-client-diversity-part-1-consensus-finalization
• https://www.kiln.fi/post/ethereum-client-diversity-part-2-execution-layer-diversity
• https://www.kiln.fi/post/ethereum-client-diversity-part-3-consensus-layer-diversity

The first one explains FFG/Casper & inactivity leak, the second one expands on the first one with a focus on execution layer diversity and the risks involved, the last one on consensus.

The last one is especially important as today, it is not recognized that there is a systemic risk with using >33% on the consensus side, it extrapolates from a bug that happened on Goerli at the dawn of the network (described by Prysm core devs here: https://x.com/potuz_eth/status/1768418899111113125). I think it would help to shape a bit differently some parts of the UX:

• red color for anything > 33% on the consensus side, green < 33%
• red color for anything > 66% on the execution side, yellow between > 33% and 66%, green < 33%

Happy to help driving in this direction if it makes sense to you :)

[aimxhaisse]

#53