Skip to content

changes or operational changes? #5

@elear

Description

@elear

From Richard Hill

  1. In section 2, part IV, the proposed IETF response is "No changes are required, as over the years since the creation of ICANN, the IETF, ICANN, and IAB have together created a system of agreements, policies, and oversight mechanisms that covers what is needed."

I would suggest that this be slightly modified to read "No operational changes are required, ..."

The reason for this change is that some non-operational changes may be required, see below.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions