Skip to content

Review "package testers" for accuracy and purpose #395

@jonahgraham

Description

@jonahgraham

Each of the EPP's has a (or multiple) designated package testers (search) who are the official maintainers of those packages.

Some of these are out of date and no longer reflect reality and this needs a review.

In addition the purpose of package testers seems to have evolved. Therefore, while thinking about the best way to represent this information we should also make sure the purpose is well considered.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions