What is the difference between this ninja-schema and django-ninja model schema

[DrJfrost]

As the title says I find a little redundant to recreate the modelchema

https://django-ninja.dev/guides/response/django-pydantic/ shouldn't the original django-ninja modelschema be used?

[eadwinCode]

@DrJfrost ninja-schema compiles to django model fields to pydantic fields with validations based on the field in question.
For example, an email field won't result to just a string type pydantic field but also a string type with email validation

[eadwinCode]

There are other features too if you check the readme.md

[DrJfrost]

wouldn't it be better to extend the ninja's buitlin modelschema? from a large project perspective having to install 3 extra packages just to set up a rest api seems a bit too much. or at least make it part of the ninja-extra setup. if the project is oriented to be django friendly it should then inherently include all the tools in it. just like DRF does with views viewset's modelviewset etc

[eadwinCode]

@DrJfrost I think it's a good idea to move it into the django-ninja extra.
Thanks for the suggestions. It will be done in future releases of django-ninja extra