Skip to content

Appsync and split strategy  #176

@NevRA

Description

@NevRA

Hey. Thanks for the lib! I have a question about Appsync.

By default, all Appsync resources will be stored in the root stack, so If I have hundreds of resolvers it will not work for me.
If I use recommended approach from the serverless-appsync-plugin:

stacks-map.js:

module.exports = {
  'AWS::AppSync::ApiKey': { destination: 'AppSync', allowSuffix: true },
  'AWS::AppSync::DataSource': { destination: 'AppSync', allowSuffix: true },
  'AWS::AppSync::FunctionConfiguration': { destination: 'AppSync', allowSuffix: true },
  'AWS::AppSync::GraphQLApi': { destination: 'AppSync', allowSuffix: true },
  'AWS::AppSync::GraphQLSchema': { destination: 'AppSync', allowSuffix: true },
  'AWS::AppSync::Resolver': { destination: 'AppSync', allowSuffix: true }
}

It will not change anything, because all the same, resolvers and other things will be together

So the idea is to split this somehow into smaller chunks. I found this solution to work for me.

const ServerlessPluginSplitStacks = require('serverless-plugin-split-stacks')

const NUMBER_OF_BINS = 10
let COUNT = 0

ServerlessPluginSplitStacks.resolveMigration = function (resource, logicalId, serverless) {
  COUNT += 1 
  const bin = COUNT % NUMBER_OF_BINS

  if (resource.Type == 'AWS::AppSync::Resolver'){
    return { destination: `GraphQLResolverStack${Math.abs(bin)}`, allowSuffix: true }
  }
  
  if (resource.Type == 'AWS::AppSync::FunctionConfiguration'){
    return { destination: `FunctionConfigurationStack${Math.abs(bin)}`, allowSuffix: true }
  }

  if (resource.Type == 'AWS::AppSync::DataSource'){
    return { destination: `GraphQLDataSourceStack${Math.abs(bin)}`, allowSuffix: true }
  }

  if (resource.Type == 'AWS::AppSync::GraphQLApi'){
    return { destination: `GraphQLApiStack${Math.abs(bin)}`, allowSuffix: true }
  }

  if (resource.Type == 'AWS::AppSync::GraphQLSchema'){
    return { destination: `GraphQLSchemaStack${Math.abs(bin)}`, allowSuffix: true }
  }

  // Fallback to default:
  return this.stacksMap[resource.Type]
}

But I'm wondering what the pitfalls are, will there be any problems with it in the future? And what strategy to use is safer?

For example with config:

nestedStackCount: 20
perFunction: false
perType: false
perGroupFunction: true

it will create some additional stacks to hold these new AppSync resources, and it is not clear whether this is a problem or not

Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions