Naming

[ramlev]

Should the module have the name 'addi_covers' instead. It's not really bound to ting, since we only need a faustnumber, and nothing from ting.

[kasperg]

Good question.

Since the module has been developed within the Ding project I think this should be reflected in the name. Perhaps ding_addi_covers?

There has been a request for a more generalized cover service and I think some of the code in this module could be used for this. In that case I image this module being invoked with a Ting object and the individual cover provider grabbing what's relevant to retrieve a cover. In that case the module name would be ting_covers.