Several questions about code base actuality

[qfox]

1. hasIntrospection looks like useless check at the moment: https://github.com/dfilatov/inherit/blob/master/lib/inherit.js#L10
2. Why not to use shims for Object.create, Object.keys, Object.assign (extend), etc.
3. Can we remove or replace comment with obscene lexic? https://github.com/dfilatov/inherit/blob/master/lib/inherit.js#L43
4. https://github.com/dfilatov/inherit/blob/master/lib/inherit.js#L49 — it is the same as Object.keys, right?
5. Why not to use noOp as emptyBase? They are both empty functions.

[dfilatov]

1. Yes, seems it can be removed.
2. What's the point?
3. Yes, we can.
4. No, it's not. Object.keys is used inside it.
5. Seems that emptyBase can be replaced with noOp.

[qfox]

1, 3, 5. Great, can we make PR for it?
2. To reduce code base, since inherit library still used in the last i-bem.
4. Feels like it depends on polyfill we use. https://github.com/es-shims/es5-shim/blob/master/es5-shim.js#L948 https://github.com/es-shims/es5-shim/blob/master/es5-shim.js#L1042 versus https://github.com/bem/es5-shims/blob/master/common.blocks/ecma/__object/ecma__object.js#L4

[dfilatov]

1, 3, 5. Yes, we can :)
2, 4. Looks unhelpful to me

[ilyar]

@zxqfox @dfilatov 1, 3, 5 ready in #37

[qfox]

Great news! I've lost this....