Skip to content

[DISCUSSION] Future for this project. #61

@littledivy

Description

@littledivy

So its been a few months since we've commited something to this projects and the lack of time and dedication required is clearly an indication that the project will not be developed actively anymore. So I am planning to either archive spruce or look out for maintainers.

A few points on why archiving is better:

  • We all can agree on the fact that Spruce is not efficient and lacks code quality.
  • We are not compliant to the new tech standards for example: using EJS, callbacks (instead of promises)
  • Filled with bugs

Would like to know your thoughts or if anyone of you are willing to maintain this project.

(cc @dan-divy/creators)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    help wantedExtra attention is needed

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions