Are you looking for help to maintain the project?

[richard-lopes]

Hello,

Our team have been an user of cxs for a few months and we like its simplicity and light size. Perfect when shipping simple widgets.

We would love to use it for larger apps and this is why having optional extra features that one could use on top of the library would be great.

I see a few great PRs are waiting to be merged and 2-3 are spot on what we have been looking for.
I do understand that maintaining many open source projects like you do is a super consuming exercise. But instead of having people fork this project to add the bits and pieces they need, it would be great if we could grow this repo. and benefit everybody.

If you are looking for co-maintainers to help out with this library, just give us a shout. As for one would be glad to help out.

Thanks.

[jxnblk]

Hi!

Actually, yes, that would be great! And thank you for asking in such a nice manner :)

For my own purposes, glamor and styled-components has mostly replaced the need for some of the things I was initially experimenting with here, but it seems like there might be a few people still interested in this library.

I think to best let this project live on, it should probably move to its own organization, and I'm planning on starting one and moving this repo over. If anyone would like to help contribute, please give a shout out here to organize.

✌️

[richard-lopes]

I am definitively keen @jxnblk
Another company I know is using it to ship standalone widgets and the lead will be very interested to contribute as well.
Thanks a lot for your work on this and all the other great projects you open source.

[richard-lopes]

Any news?

[jxnblk]

@richard-lopes Sorry for the delay on this. I was hoping a few others would chime in, but I'll go ahead and add you to the repo org

[richard-lopes]

Thanks

[nosamanuel]

@jxnblk I think this project has a unique perspective with its "zero dependency" approach.

I feel like we could really capitalize on that perspective by becoming totally framework-agnostic (not support for all frameworks, but support for no frameworks).

Happy to contribute however I can if you agree with ceding the "batteries included" territory to the Glamor and Styled Components. In my view, both would be better off using this project as a building block.

[dylmye]

Hi, are you looking for any other maintainers?

[osdevisnot]

I posted some thoughts in #113 about this. In general I want to capitalize on the idea proposed by @nosamanuel

I feel like we could really capitalize on that perspective by becoming totally framework-agnostic (not support for all frameworks, but support for no frameworks).

Attempting this though, I am unsure how we could handle the dynamic styling aspects. i.e. how do we take in dynamic props and generate class name based on current values.

In general, something like this should work, but I haven't had enough time to explore that idea.

cc: @dylmye @richard-lopes

[AlexGalays]

@jxnblk

I'm curious what you found in styled-components compared to this lib? it's certainly slower and fatter!