Change the examples of valid breeds of languages in the documentation

[ulyssear]

Expected Behavior

The examples of valid breeds of languages seem to have some entries irrelevant such as "Javascript for Node".

Actual Behavior

Change from "All different breeds of languages (ex: JavaScript for browsers, JavaScript for Node, TypeScript, ECMAScript, etc.)" to "All different breeds of languages (ex: TypeScript, Coffeescript, ECMAScript 2023, etc.)".

Step to Reproduce the Problem

Go to URL https://docs.codethesaur.us/website/project-architecture/#what-should-be-included

[geekygirlsarah]

I guess I'd ask why entries like that are irrelevant. You can do things in Node.js you can't do in browser-based JS. Also Typescript, though compiles into JS, isn't JS (similar to Scala isn't Java though you can incorporate Java into it).