opal/opal-webpack

[svoop]

This appears to be the most advanced shot at opal-webpack, how about moving it to the Opal organization and start looking for a maintainer?

@elia write on Gitter (Oct 07 2016 22:27):

I'd be happy to add an official opal/opal-webpack repo (with its official maintainer ), sprockets support has been extracted from opal@master to opal/opal-sprockets, paving the way exactly for this kind of things

I'd help out updating the documentation here and there, but lack the webpack insight to jump at the code. Nonetheless, webpack appears to be the future (given the challenges Sprockets is facing), so maybe it's time to push it a little more towards the spotlight. What do you think?

[svoop]

@fkchang FYI, not sure whether you're already working on this.

[wied03]

It makes sense to me. I just haven't had the time to work on this much. :( sent from my mobile device

…

On Apr 23, 2017 8:15 AM, "Sven Schwyn" ***@***.***> wrote: This appears to be the most advanced shot at opal-webpack, how about moving it to the Opal organization and start looking for a maintainer? @elia <https://github.com/elia> write on Gitter (Oct 07 2016 22:27): I'd be happy to add an official opal/opal-webpack repo (with its official maintainer ), sprockets support has been extracted from ***@***.*** to opal/opal-sprockets, paving the way exactly for this kind of things I'd help out updating the documentation here and there, but lack the webpack insight to jump at the code. Nonetheless, webpack appears to be the future (given the challenges Sprockets is facing), so maybe it's time to push it a little more towards the spotlight. What do you think? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#39>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASIo5F1ApbD-TCWUBU4d9k8Y0QzJtu2ks5ry1z0gaJpZM4NFa5H> .