Is User Consent needed #10
Replies: 4 comments
-
|
the IoT Device Management API also consider IoT devices owned by customers but, in their scenario, the API manages just one device while the IoT-NO API is intended for a fleet of IoT devices optimizing the network for all of them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Discussion in ICM: camaraproject/IdentityAndConsentManagement#299 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
According to the discussion in ICM, I suggest to focus the IoT NO API to M2M SIM so we can use 2Legs
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
proposal: add this feature in the Sync26 release |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
the IoT-NO API gets as input a list of devices. A general CAMARA rule is that if a Device is used as input of the API, user consent is required. The scenario for this API is anyway related to IoT devices not owned by customers. User consent doesn't apply for this API so I suggest to use 2Legs authentication.
Unless we think that the API can also be used with IoT device owned by specific person.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions