Skip to content

"fields" isn't fully supported #121

@MichaelXavier

Description

@MichaelXavier

I was just going to solve this but I ended up not needing this, so I figured I'd write it up here as a known issue and discuss the solution.

We support specifying "fields" in the search. When you do that, the response will have a fields attribute with a map from field name to value. Combining the docs and my experimentation, the fields you specify must be "leaves". If we want to be really precise with the types, the type would be something like HashMap Text ValueWithNoObjectConstructor

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions