Lexical ambiguity in pt.2 "with"

[jeremy-vernon-bcgov]

There is a problematic ambiguity in "with" in the title of pt. 2 which I doubt was intended. If we mean "design with people in mind" we should probably say so. If we mean "design for people" we should say that.

Though I think we should probably say something a) less pat - even if you're designing poorly you're still designing for someone b) more precise and descriptive of what we actually intend.

You can design for people in multiple ways, which ways are the most important for our context?

Quality experience? efficiency? engagement? ease of use? delight? there's a long list of possibilities, we should pick one...maybe two.