Conversation
|
Claude finished @gdauber1's task —— View job Code Review for PR #23: sso_authTodo List
SummaryThis PR adds authentication token support to the SSO module by passing both user and service tokens to the Code Quality and Best Practices ✅
Potential Bugs or Issues 🚨1. Token Confusion in Service Role ContextIn sso: createSsoModule(serviceRoleAxiosClient, appId, token, serviceToken),This seems incorrect because:
Recommendation: Consider if the user token is really needed in the service role context. If both tokens are required, the parameter naming and usage should be clearer. 2. Redundant Authorization HeadersThe axios instance passed to
Performance Considerations ✅
Security Concerns 🔒1. Token ExposureThe current implementation passes both user and service tokens to the SSO module. This raises concerns:
Recommendation: Document clearly when and why both tokens would be needed simultaneously. 2. Authorization Header FormatGood to see proper Bearer token format is used for both authorization headers. Test Coverage ❌Critical Issue: No tests found for the SSO module
Recommendation: Add comprehensive tests for:
Additional Recommendations
|
🚀 Package Preview Available!Install this PR's preview build with npm: npm i @base44-preview/sdk@0.6.0-pr.23.c0dc7dcPrefer not to change any import paths? Install using npm alias so your code still imports npm i "@base44/sdk@npm:@base44-preview/sdk@0.6.0-pr.23.c0dc7dc"Or add it to your {
"dependencies": {
"@base44/sdk": "npm:@base44-preview/sdk@0.6.0-pr.23.c0dc7dc"
}
}
Preview published to npm registry — try new features instantly! |
| async getAccessToken(userid: string) { | ||
| const url = `/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken/${userid}`; | ||
| return axios.get(url); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| // Prepare headers with both tokens if available | |
| const headers: Record<string, string> = {}; | |
| if (userToken) { | |
| headers['Base44-On-Behalf-Of'] = `Bearer ${userToken}`; | |
| } | |
| return axios.get(url, { headers }); |
the concept
|
Claude finished @gdauber1's task —— View job Code Review for PR #23: sso_authTodo List
SummaryThis PR modifies the SSO module to accept and use a user token when making Code Quality and Best Practices ✅
Potential Bugs or Issues 🚨1. Unused Service Token ParameterThe JSDoc in 2. Token Context MismatchIn sso: createSsoModule(serviceRoleAxiosClient, appId, token, serviceToken),Issues:
3. Header Name InconsistencyThe implementation uses Performance Considerations ✅No performance concerns identified. The implementation is lightweight with minimal overhead. Security Concerns 🔒1. Token MixingPassing user tokens in service-role contexts could lead to:
Recommendation: Consider if the SSO module should be user-context only, or if service-role SSO operations need different handling. 2. Header AuthorizationGood that you're using proper Bearer token format. However, ensure the server properly validates and handles the Test Coverage ❌Critical Issue: No tests exist for the SSO module
Recommendation: Add tests for:
Additional Recommendations1. Fix Function SignatureRemove the unused export function createSsoModule(
axios: AxiosInstance,
appId: string,
userToken?: string
// Remove serviceToken from JSDoc or add it here
)2. Clarify Module ContextConsider whether SSO should be available in service-role context. If yes, document the use case. If no, remove it from 3. Standardize Header NamesAlign with @netanelgilad's suggestion if 4. Add Integration TestsBefore merging, add comprehensive tests to ensure the SSO module behaves correctly with various token combinations. |
|
Claude finished @gdauber1's task —— View job Code Review for PR #23: sso_authTodo List
SummaryThis PR modifies the SSO module to accept and forward a user token via the Code Quality and Best Practices ✅
Potential Bugs or Issues 🚨1. JSDoc Documentation MismatchThe JSDoc at src/modules/sso.ts:8 still documents a * @param {string} [serviceToken] - Service role authentication token // ← Not in function signature
*/
export function createSsoModule(
axios: AxiosInstance,
appId: string,
userToken?: string // ← Only 3 parameters
)2. Function Call Parameter MismatchIn src/client.ts:88, you're passing 4 arguments but the function only accepts 3: sso: createSsoModule(serviceRoleAxiosClient, appId, token, serviceToken),
// ↑ 4th parameter not acceptedThis will be silently ignored in JavaScript but indicates a misunderstanding of the API. 3. Header Format InconsistencyThe implementation uses Performance Considerations ✅No performance concerns identified. The implementation is lightweight with minimal overhead. Security Concerns 🔒1. User Token in Service ContextYou're passing the user token to the SSO module within the service role context (src/client.ts:88). This creates a confusing security model where:
Recommendation: Clarify whether SSO operations should be user-context only or if there's a valid use case for service-role SSO operations. 2. Token HandlingGood that you're using the Bearer token format. However, ensure your backend properly validates the Test Coverage ❌Critical Issue: No tests exist for the SSO module
Recommendation: Before merging, add tests for:
Comparison with Previous ReviewsIssues Addressed:
Issues Still Outstanding:
Recommendations
|
2 participants
No description provided.