sso_token_flow

[galdauber12]

No description provided.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[github-actions]

🚀 Package Preview Available!

---

Install this PR's preview build with npm:

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/base44dev/javascript-sdk/@base44/sdk@7fdb4057df7803be2299136311a88e175b55df62

• 📦 Preview Package on pkg.pr.new
• 🔗 View this commit on GitHub

---

_{Preview powered by pkg.pr.new — try new features instantly, no NPM release needed!}

[claude]

Claude finished @galdauber12's task —— View job

---

Pull Request Review

I've completed my review of the SSO token flow implementation. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Todo List:

• Read and analyze the changed file (src/modules/auth.ts)
• Check for repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Review code quality and best practices
• Identify potential bugs or issues
• Assess performance considerations
• Check for security concerns
• Evaluate test coverage needs
• Provide comprehensive feedback

---

Review Summary

The PR adds a new getSsoAccessToken() method to the auth module. While the implementation is straightforward, there are several issues that need to be addressed.

🐛 Critical Issues

1. Typo in API Endpoint - src/modules/auth.ts:28

return axios.get(`/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/acesstoken`);
//                                      ^^^^^^^^
//                                      Should be "accesstoken" 

There's a typo: acesstoken should be accesstoken. This will cause the API call to fail.

2. Duplicate and Incorrect JSDoc Comment - src/modules/auth.ts:23-26

/**
 * Get current user information  // ← Wrong description
 * @returns {Promise<Object>} Current user data  // ← Wrong return type
 */

The JSDoc comment is copy-pasted from the me() method above and doesn't describe the actual function.

🔧 Code Quality Issues

3. Inconsistent Indentation - src/modules/auth.ts:27-29

The new method uses inconsistent indentation (8 spaces + 2 spaces) compared to other methods in the file which use 4 spaces.

4. Missing Type Information

The method should specify what type of access token object it returns, similar to how loginViaUsernamePassword specifies its return type.

5. No Error Handling

Unlike other methods in this module, there's no error handling or cleanup logic for failed requests.

🛡️ Security Considerations

• Medium Risk: The endpoint appears to return sensitive SSO access tokens. Consider:
  • Whether this endpoint should require additional authentication
  • If the response should be logged (ensure tokens aren't logged accidentally)
  • Adding rate limiting considerations in documentation

🧪 Test Coverage

Missing Tests: The new getSsoAccessToken() method has no test coverage. The existing test suite in tests/unit/auth.test.js is comprehensive but doesn't cover this new functionality.

Recommended Tests:

• Success case: Should return SSO access token
• Error case: Should handle 401/403 responses appropriately
• Error case: Should handle network failures

📈 Performance Considerations

No significant performance concerns - it's a simple GET request similar to existing methods.

🔄 Recommended Changes

1. Fix the typo: Change acesstoken to accesstoken in line 28
2. Update JSDoc: Provide accurate documentation for the method
3. Fix indentation: Use consistent 4-space indentation
4. Add TypeScript return type: Specify the expected response structure
5. Add error handling: Consider if any cleanup is needed on failures
6. Add tests: Create test cases covering success and error scenarios

💯 Positive Notes

• Follows existing patterns in the codebase
• Simple and focused implementation
• Consistent with other auth methods' structure

---

[claude]

Claude finished @galdauber12's task —— View job

---

Pull Request Review

I've completed my review of the SSO token flow implementation. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md - not found, proceeding without repo-specific guidelines)
• Read and analyze the changed file (src/modules/auth.ts)
• Check existing test patterns for consistency
• Review code quality and best practices
• Identify potential bugs or issues
• Assess performance considerations
• Check for security concerns
• Evaluate test coverage needs
• Provide comprehensive feedback

---

Review Summary

The PR adds a new getSsoAccessToken() method to the auth module at src/modules/auth.ts:23-29. While the implementation follows the existing patterns, there are several issues that need to be addressed.

🐛 Critical Issues

1. Incorrect JSDoc Comment - src/modules/auth.ts:23-26

/**
 * Get current user information  // ← Wrong description
 * @returns {Promise<Object>} Current user data  // ← Wrong return type
 */

The JSDoc comment is copy-pasted from the me() method above and doesn't describe the actual function. This should be updated to properly describe the SSO access token functionality.

2. Inconsistent Code Style - src/modules/auth.ts:27-29

The new method uses inconsistent indentation. Lines 27-29 appear to use mixed indentation (8 spaces + 2 spaces) compared to the rest of the file which uses consistent 4-space indentation.

🔧 Code Quality Issues

3. Missing Type Information

The method should specify what type of access token object it returns. Looking at the existing loginViaUsernamePassword method, it properly types its return value. Consider adding a proper return type annotation.

4. No Error Handling Pattern

Unlike the loginViaUsernamePassword method which includes comprehensive error handling and cleanup logic (lines 148-154), the new method lacks any error handling considerations. While not necessarily critical, this inconsistency should be noted.

🛡️ Security Considerations

• Medium Risk: The endpoint returns sensitive SSO access tokens. Consider:
  • Whether this endpoint should require additional authentication
  • If the response should be logged (ensure tokens aren't logged accidentally)
  • Adding rate limiting considerations in documentation
  • The API path /apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken appears to be correct (no typo found in current implementation)

🧪 Test Coverage

Missing Tests: The new getSsoAccessToken() method has no test coverage. The existing test suite in tests/unit/auth.test.js is comprehensive (576 lines) but doesn't cover this new functionality.

Recommended Test Cases:

• Success case: Should return SSO access token for valid app
• Error case: Should handle 401/403 responses appropriately
• Error case: Should handle network failures
• Integration test: Should work with existing auth flow

Test Pattern: Based on the existing test file, new tests should follow this pattern:

describe('getSsoAccessToken()', () => {
  test('should fetch SSO access token', async () => {
    const mockToken = { access_token: 'sso-token-123', expires_in: 3600 };
    scope.get(`/api/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`)
      .reply(200, mockToken);
    const result = await base44.auth.getSsoAccessToken();
    expect(result).toEqual(mockToken);
    expect(scope.isDone()).toBe(true);
  });
});

📈 Performance Considerations

No significant performance concerns - it's a simple GET request similar to existing methods like me().

🔄 Recommended Changes

1. Update JSDoc: Provide accurate documentation describing the SSO access token functionality
2. Fix indentation: Use consistent 4-space indentation to match the rest of the file
3. Add TypeScript return type: Specify the expected SSO token response structure
4. Consider error handling: Evaluate if any special cleanup is needed on failures (following the pattern in loginViaUsernamePassword)
5. Add comprehensive tests: Create test cases covering success and error scenarios

💯 Positive Notes

• Follows existing patterns in the codebase
• Simple and focused implementation
• Consistent with other auth methods' structure
• Uses proper TypeScript parameter typing
• Correctly implements the async/await pattern

---

Priority

High Priority: JSDoc correction and code formatting consistency
Medium Priority: Test coverage and type annotations
Low Priority: Enhanced error handling (nice to have for consistency)

[claude]

Claude finished @galdauber12's task —— View job

---

Pull Request Review

I've completed my review of the SSO token flow implementation. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Todo List:

• Check for repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md - not found, proceeding without repo-specific guidelines)
• Read and analyze the changed file (src/modules/auth.ts)
• Check existing test patterns for consistency
• Review code quality and best practices
• Identify potential bugs or issues
• Assess performance considerations
• Check for security concerns
• Evaluate test coverage needs
• Provide comprehensive feedback

---

Review Summary

The PR adds a new getSsoAccessToken() method to the auth module at src/modules/auth.ts:23-29. While the implementation follows the existing patterns, there are several issues that need to be addressed.

🐛 Critical Issues

1. Incorrect JSDoc Comment - src/modules/auth.ts:23-26

/**
 * Get current user sso access token  // ✅ Correct description
 * @returns {Promise<Object>} Current user sso access_token  // ✅ Correct return type
 */

Note: The JSDoc comment appears to be correct in the current implementation, unlike what was reported in previous reviews.

2. Inconsistent Code Style - src/modules/auth.ts:27-29

The new method uses inconsistent indentation. Lines 28-29 use 10 spaces instead of the standard 6 spaces used throughout the file:

async getSsoAccessToken() {
          return axios.get(`/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`);  // 10 spaces
    },  // 4 spaces

Should be:

async getSsoAccessToken() {
      return axios.get(`/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`);  // 6 spaces
    },  // 4 spaces

🔧 Code Quality Issues

3. Missing Type Information

The method should specify what type of access token object it returns. Looking at the existing loginViaUsernamePassword method, it properly types its return value. Consider adding a proper return type annotation for consistency.

4. No Error Handling Pattern

Unlike the loginViaUsernamePassword method which includes comprehensive error handling and cleanup logic (lines 148-154), the new method lacks any error handling considerations. While not necessarily critical for a simple GET request, this inconsistency should be noted.

🛡️ Security Considerations

• Medium Risk: The endpoint returns sensitive SSO access tokens. Consider:
  • Whether this endpoint should require additional authentication
  • If the response should be logged (ensure tokens aren't logged accidentally)
  • Adding rate limiting considerations in documentation
  • The API path /apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken appears to be correct

🧪 Test Coverage

Missing Tests: The new getSsoAccessToken() method has no test coverage. The existing test suite in tests/unit/auth.test.js is comprehensive (576 lines) but doesn't cover this new functionality.

Recommended Test Cases:

• Success case: Should return SSO access token for valid app
• Error case: Should handle 401/403 responses appropriately
• Error case: Should handle network failures
• Integration test: Should work with existing auth flow

Test Pattern: Based on the existing test file, new tests should follow this pattern:

describe('getSsoAccessToken()', () => {
  test('should fetch SSO access token', async () => {
    const mockToken = { access_token: 'sso-token-123', expires_in: 3600 };
    scope.get(`/api/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`)
      .reply(200, mockToken);
    const result = await base44.auth.getSsoAccessToken();
    expect(result).toEqual(mockToken);
    expect(scope.isDone()).toBe(true);
  });
  
  test('should handle authentication errors', async () => {
    scope.get(`/api/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`)
      .reply(401, { detail: 'Unauthorized' });
    await expect(base44.auth.getSsoAccessToken()).rejects.toThrow();
    expect(scope.isDone()).toBe(true);
  });
});

📈 Performance Considerations

No significant performance concerns - it's a simple GET request similar to existing methods like me().

🔄 Recommended Changes

1. Fix indentation: Use consistent 6-space indentation to match the rest of the file
2. Add TypeScript return type: Specify the expected SSO token response structure
3. Add comprehensive tests: Create test cases covering success and error scenarios
4. Consider error handling: Evaluate if any special cleanup is needed on failures (following the pattern in loginViaUsernamePassword)

💯 Positive Notes

• Follows existing patterns in the codebase
• Simple and focused implementation
• Consistent with other auth methods' structure
• Uses proper TypeScript parameter typing
• Correctly implements the async/await pattern
• JSDoc documentation is accurate and descriptive

---

Priority

High Priority: Code formatting consistency (indentation)
Medium Priority: Test coverage and type annotations
Low Priority: Enhanced error handling (nice to have for consistency)

The implementation is functional but needs formatting consistency and test coverage to meet the project's standards.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @galdauber12's task —— View job

---

Pull Request Review

I've completed my review of the SSO token flow implementation. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

Todo List:

• Check for repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md - not found, proceeding without repo-specific guidelines)
• Read and analyze the changed file (src/modules/auth.ts)
• Check existing test patterns for consistency
• Review code quality and best practices
• Identify potential bugs or issues
• Assess performance considerations
• Check for security concerns
• Evaluate test coverage needs
• Provide comprehensive feedback

---

Review Summary

The PR adds a new getSsoAccessToken() method to the auth module at src/modules/auth.ts:23-29. While the implementation follows existing patterns, there are several areas for improvement.

🔧 Code Quality Issues

1. Inconsistent Indentation - src/modules/auth.ts:28

The method body uses 10 spaces for indentation instead of the consistent 6 spaces used throughout the rest of the file:

async getSsoAccessToken() {
          return axios.get(`/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`);  // 10 spaces - inconsistent
    },

Should be:

async getSsoAccessToken() {
      return axios.get(`/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`);  // 6 spaces - consistent
    },

2. Missing Type Information

The method lacks specific return type annotation. For consistency with the codebase and better TypeScript support, consider adding a proper return type that describes the SSO token structure.

🧪 Test Coverage - Critical Gap

Missing Tests: The new getSsoAccessToken() method has no test coverage. The existing test suite in tests/unit/auth.test.js is comprehensive (576 lines) but doesn't include this new functionality.

Recommended Test Cases:

describe('getSsoAccessToken()', () => {
  test('should fetch SSO access token', async () => {
    const mockToken = { 
      access_token: 'sso-token-123', 
      expires_in: 3600,
      token_type: 'Bearer'
    };
    scope.get(`/api/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`)
      .reply(200, mockToken);
    
    const result = await base44.auth.getSsoAccessToken();
    expect(result).toEqual(mockToken);
    expect(scope.isDone()).toBe(true);
  });
  
  test('should handle authentication errors', async () => {
    scope.get(`/api/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`)
      .reply(401, { detail: 'Unauthorized' });
    
    await expect(base44.auth.getSsoAccessToken()).rejects.toThrow();
    expect(scope.isDone()).toBe(true);
  });
  
  test('should handle network failures', async () => {
    scope.get(`/api/apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken`)
      .replyWithError('Network error');
    
    await expect(base44.auth.getSsoAccessToken()).rejects.toThrow();
    expect(scope.isDone()).toBe(true);
  });
});

🛡️ Security Considerations

• Medium Risk: The endpoint returns sensitive SSO access tokens. Consider:
  • Whether this endpoint should require additional authentication beyond the existing app-level auth
  • Ensuring SSO tokens are not logged accidentally in application logs
  • Adding rate limiting considerations in documentation
  • The API path /apps/${appId}/auth/sso/accesstoken appears correct and follows existing patterns

📈 Performance Considerations

No significant performance concerns - it's a simple GET request similar to existing methods like me().

🔄 Error Handling

Unlike the loginViaUsernamePassword method which includes comprehensive error handling and cleanup logic (src/modules/auth.ts:148-154), the new method lacks any error handling considerations. While not necessarily critical for a simple GET request, this creates inconsistency in error handling patterns.

💯 Positive Notes

• ✅ Follows existing patterns in the codebase structure
• ✅ Simple and focused implementation
• ✅ Consistent with other auth methods' async/await pattern
• ✅ JSDoc documentation is accurate and descriptive
• ✅ Uses proper TypeScript parameter typing
• ✅ API endpoint follows the established /apps/${appId}/auth/... pattern

🎯 Recommended Actions

High Priority:

1. Fix indentation: Use consistent 6-space indentation to match the rest of the file
2. Add comprehensive tests: Create test cases covering success and error scenarios (following the existing test patterns)

Medium Priority:
3. Add TypeScript return type: Specify the expected SSO token response structure
4. Consider error handling: Evaluate if any special cleanup is needed on failures (following the pattern in loginViaUsernamePassword)

Low Priority:
5. Documentation: Consider adding usage examples in the JSDoc comment

---

Priority Assessment

🔴 High Priority: Code formatting consistency and test coverage are essential
🟡 Medium Priority: Type annotations and error handling for consistency
🟢 Low Priority: Enhanced documentation

The implementation is functional but needs formatting consistency and comprehensive test coverage to meet the project's quality standards.

---